42 U.S.C. § 1109
DEFINITIONS.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1937–2002 · leading case: Freimark & Thurston Agency, Inc. v. Nat'l City Bank, 231 F. Supp. 2d 713 (S.D. Ohio 2002).
Freimark & Thurston Agency, Inc. v. Nat'l City Bank, 231 F. Supp. 2d 713 (S.D. Ohio 2002). “It therefore seeks the reimbursement of those losses on behalf of the Plan, pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1109 & 1132(e) (“ERISA”). 2 Both National City and Bransford argue that they were never fiduciaries to the Plan, and that even if…”
Chas. C. Steward MacH. Co. v. Davis, 89 F.2d 207 (5th Cir. 1937). “* We do not consider the credits under sections 909 and 910 ( 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1109 , 1110) since they are not yet' operative.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.