42 U.S.C. § 12
REPORT.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32
cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: Guzmán-Rosario v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 397 F.3d 6 (1st Cir. 2005).
Guzmán-Rosario v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 397 F.3d 6 (1st Cir. 2005). “Abigail Guzmán-Rosario (“Guzmán”) sued United Parcel Service (“UPS”) in the district court for violations of Titles I and V of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12 , 101-12, 213 (2000), and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.”
Shaw v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 609 F.3d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2010). “We conclude that 42 U.S.C. § 12 (e) confers jurisdiction on the Court of Federal Claims to review interim attorney fee decisions.”
Rosa v. 600 Broadway Partners, LLC, 175 F. Supp. 3d 191 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). “” 42 U.S.C § 12 182(a). “To state a claim under Title III, [Plaintiff] must allege (1) that she is disabled within the meaning of the ADA; (2) that defendants own, lease, or operate a place of public accommodation; and (3) that defendants discriminated against her by denying her…”
Rockefeller v. United States Court of Appeals Off., for the Tenth Circuit Judges, 248 F. Supp. 2d 17 (D.D.C. 2003). “After the EEOC dismissal, the plaintiff filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico alleging that: (1) the DOE denied him reasonable accommodations for his disabilities as guaranteed by the American’s with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42…”
Guerin v. Pointe Coupee Par. Nursing Home, 246 F. Supp. 2d 488 (M.D. La. 2003). “42 U.S.C. § 12 111 (9)(B). 37 . Gile v. United Airlines, Inc.”
R.K. Ex Rel. A.K. v. Sec'y of the Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 125 Fed. Cl. 276 (Fed. Cl. 2016). “at 2 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 12 (d)(4)(B) (emphasis added)).”
Little Rock Sch. Dist. v. Mauney, 183 F.3d 816 (8th Cir. 1999). “For example, Congress in 1990 passed the ADA, 42 U.S.C. §§12 ,101-213 (1998), essentially extending the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.”
Long v. Howard Univ., 561 F. Supp. 2d 85 (D.D.C. 2008). “The two requests at issue used very broad and ambiguous language, stating only that “[pllaintiff is disabled within the meaning of the Americans with Disabilities Act Title II, 42 U.S.C. § 12 ,101,” and substantially the same with respect to the Rehabilitation Act, with only the…”
Florida Paraplegic, Ass'n v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, 166 F.3d 1126 (11th Cir. 1999). “See 42 U.S.C. § 12 11 l(5)(B)(i). According to the Associations, Congress's decision to exclude tribes from one title of the statute demonstrates that it intended the remaining titles to cover tribes.”
Welsh v. Boy Scouts of Am., 993 F.2d 1267 (7th Cir. 1993). “1992) (involving public accommodation), expands the number of establishments in its definition of “places of public accommodation,” this court must expand Title II to include membership organizations. 2 This argument fails to recognize, that had Congress intended to include…”
United States v. Three Juveniles, 886 F. Supp. 934 (D. Mass. 1995). “That section generally covers any “place of exhibition or entertainment which serves the public, or any other establishment which serves the public and (i) which is located within the premises of which is physically located any of the aforesaid establishments; and (ii) which…”
Carter v. RMH Teleservices, Inc., 205 F. App'x 214 (5th Cir. 2006). “§ 1140 ; the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12 , et seq.; and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.