U.S. Code
»
Title 42
» Chapter CHAPTER 129— NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE STATE GRANT PROGRAM › Division Division F— Administrative Provisions
42 U.S.C. § 12645f
Restrictions on Federal Government and use of Federal funds
(a) General prohibitionNothing in the national service laws shall be construed to authorize an officer or employee of the Federal Government to mandate, direct, or control a State, local educational agency, or school’s curriculum, program of instruction, or allocation of State or local resources, or mandate a State or any subdivision thereof to spend any funds or incur any costs not paid for under this chapter.
(b) Prohibition on endorsement of curriculumNotwithstanding any other prohibition of Federal law, no funds provided to the Corporation under this chapter may be used by the Corporation to endorse, approve, or sanction any curriculum designed to be used in an elementary school or secondary school.
(c) Prohibition on requiring Federal approval or certification standardsNotwithstanding any other provision of Federal law, not 11 So in original. Probably should be “no”. State shall be required to have academic content or student academic achievement standards approved or certified by the Federal Government, in order to receive assistance under this chapter.
(Pub. L. 101–610, title I, § 189C, as added Pub. L. 111–13, title I, § 1612, Apr. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 1540.)Editorial NotesReferences in TextThis chapter, referred to in text, was in the original “this Act”, meaning Pub. L. 101–610, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3127, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 12501 of this title and Tables.
Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective DateSection effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 6101(a) of Pub. L. 111–13, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 4950 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
— 42 U.S.C. § 12645f(a) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.