42 U.S.C. § 1365
Repealed. Pub. L. 86–442, § 1, Apr. 22, 1960, 74 Stat. 81
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1986–2020 · leading case: Stillwater of Crown Point Homeowner's Ass'n v. Kovich
Stillwater of Crown Point Homeowner's Ass'n v. Kovich (2011)
“See 42 U.S.C. § 1365 (a). Section 1319(d) provides that “any person who violates section 1311 .”
Surcco v. Prasa (2001)
“In the case at bar, the action is in the process of being investigated and prosecuted by the EPA, thus, from the plain reading of the statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1365 (b)(1)(B), this Court cannot view the Administrative action as ceased, hence barring this forum form viewing said…”
Fishel v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. (1986)
“§§ 6925 (a) and 6930, CWA claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1365 (a), and CERCLA claims under 42 U.”
Jarose v. County of Humboldt (2020)
“2 § 1311, as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1365 . Id. ¶ 6 . 3 On November 6, 2019, the Estate filed the instant Motion to Modify the Scheduling 4 Order and for Leave to Amend the Pleadings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.