42 U.S.C. § 13701
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases, 1998–2019 · leading case: Commonwealth v. Boyer
Commonwealth v. Boyer (2004)
“" 42 U.S.C. § 13701 (1). Accordingly, Appellant's assertion that there is a requirement that violent offenders in Pennsylvania must serve 85% of their maximum sentence is without merit as there is no such mandate.”
Gundy v. United States (2019)
“1345 , note following 42 U. S. C. §13701 (1994 ed., Supp. II). By that time, every State and the District of Columbia had enacted a sex-offender registration law.”
State v. Morales (2001)
“Part 1 violent crimes are defined in 42 U.S.C. § 13701 (2) (2001) as "murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault as reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for purposes of the Uniform Crime Reports.”
People v. Othman (2019)
“The Congress of the United States responded with the [Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 ( 42 U.S.C. § 13701 (1994))]. Among other things the bill provided federal incentive money for states that adopted truth in sentencing laws in which violent offenders must…”
Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc. (2008)
“The legislature has eliminated the filing fee requirement to "increase victim's access to protection" and comply with the federal Violence Against Women Act ( 42 U.S.C. § 13701 ). S.B. REP. on S.B. 5219, at 4, 54th Leg.”
Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc. (2008)
“The legislature has eliminated the filing fee requirement to “increase victim’s access to protection” and comply with the federal Violence Against Women Act ( 42 U.S.C. § 13701 ). S.B. Rep. on S.B. 5219, at 4, 54th Leg.”
Stewart v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole (1998)
““Violent crimes” (referred to as “part 1 violent crimes”) in the Federal Act are defined as “murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault as reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for purposes of the Uniform Crime Reports_” 42…”
People v. Buffer (2017)
“The Congress of the United States responded with the [Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 ( 42 U.S.C. § 13701 (1994))]. Among other things the bill provided federal incentive money for states that adopted truth in sentencing laws in which violent offenders must…”
People v. Buffer (2017)
“The Congress of the United States responded with the [Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 ( 42 U.S.C. § 13701 (1994))]. Among other things the bill provided federal incentive money for states that adopted truth in sentencing laws in which violent offenders must…”
State v. Donaghy (2000)
“That these issues are intertwined is further evidenced by the Violence Against Women Act of 1994, 42 U.S.C. § 13701 et seq., which provides funding for a number of projects addressing domestic violence, due to its disproportionate impact on women.”
Commonwealth v. Baldwin (2000)
“4 Without any reference to authority or citation, Appellant opines that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole interprets the Violent Offender Incarceration and Truth in Sentencing Grants Act ( 42 U.S.C. §§ 13701 , et seq.) to require defendants to serve 85 percent of…”
Kenneth McGoy v. Walter S. Ray, Jr. (2006)
“In his brief in support of his motion for a continuance, McGoy alleged the Board’s 90 percent policy was adopted to qualify for federal funding under the Violent Offenders Incarceration and Truth-In-Sentencing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 13701 , et. seq. (VOITIS), and noted the affidavit…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.