42 U.S.C. § 13710
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1997–2003 · leading case: Jackson v. Brook Ledge, Inc., 991 F. Supp. 640 (E.D. Ky. 1997).
Jackson v. Brook Ledge, Inc., 991 F. Supp. 640 (E.D. Ky. 1997). “42 U.S.C. § 13710 (a)(1). Accordingly, this Court finds that the first prong of the test shall be succeeded by the directive found in the TIRRA provision , set forth above.”
Converting Sys., Inc. v. Hot-Line Freight Sys., Inc., 801 N.E.2d 155 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “After the 1995 legislation, that requirement was modified so that a carrier now must “maintain an appropriate tariff pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 13710 (a)(1)” as one condition for limiting its liability.”
California v. Dep't of Just., 114 F.3d 1222 (D.C. Cir. 1997). “See 42 U.S.C. § 13710 . In July of that year the Department of Justice announced a grant procedure by which it would distribute this $500 million pro rata to the States incurring costs for the incarceration of undocumented criminal aliens, but it would not incarcerate any of…”
Opp, Shelley v. Wheaton Van Lines, 231 F.3d 1060 (7th Cir. 2000). “§ 14706 (a)(1), unless the carrier does the following to limit its liability: (1) maintain an appropriate tariff pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 13710 (a)(1), Jackson v. Brook Ledge, Inc.”
Converting Sys., Inc. v. Hot-Line Freight Sys., Inc. (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “After the 1995 legislation, that requirement was modified so that a carrier now must "maintain an appropriate tariff pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §13710 (a)(1)" as one condition for limiting its liability.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.