42 U.S.C. § 1383e
Treatment referrals for individuals with alcoholism or drug addiction condition
In the case of any individual whose benefits under this subchapter are paid to a representative payee pursuant to section 1383(a)(2)(A)(ii)(II) of this title, the Commissioner of Social Security shall refer such individual to the appropriate State agency administering the State plan for substance abuse treatment services approved under subpart II of part B of title XIX of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300x–21 et seq.).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1986–2006 · leading case: Roach v. Morse
Roach v. Morse (2006)
“42 U.S.C. § 1383e(a). Accordingly, Vermont must employ a methodology for determining Medicaid eligibility for medically-needy applicants that is “no more restrictive than the methodology which would be employed under the supplemental security income [SSI] program.”
McMahon v. Novello (2001)
“Once a person’s SSI benefits are terminated, that person also often loses Medicaid 3 benefits, even though they are entitled to continued Medicaid eligibility under 42 U.S.C. § 1383e(c) 4 . Plaintiffs sought injunctive relief guaranteeing their statutory and constitutional 5…”
Kraft v. Commissioner of Public Welfare (1986)
“See 42U.S.C. § 1383e (1982 & Supp. II 1984) and note 5, infra.”
Mitchell v. Apfel (1998)
“104-121, § 105 provided for the rerouting of federal funds from awards of disability benefits' to funding for state sponsored drug and alcohol treatment. Moreover, individuals found to be disabled for reasons other than their substance abuse/addiction not only continue to…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1383e(a) — 1 case
Roach v. Morse (2006)
“42 U.S.C. § 1383e(a). Accordingly, Vermont must employ a methodology for determining Medicaid eligibility for medically-needy applicants that is “no more restrictive than the methodology which would be employed under the supplemental security income [SSI] program.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1383e(c) — 1 case
McMahon v. Novello (2001)
“Once a person’s SSI benefits are terminated, that person also often loses Medicaid 3 benefits, even though they are entitled to continued Medicaid eligibility under 42 U.S.C. § 1383e(c) 4 . Plaintiffs sought injunctive relief guaranteeing their statutory and constitutional 5…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.