42 U.S.C. § 1385

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1976–2018 · leading case: United States v. Carell, 681 F. Supp. 2d 874 (M.D. Tenn. 2009).
United States v. Carell, 681 F. Supp. 2d 874 (M.D. Tenn. 2009). “Palmetto Government Benefits Administrators, LLC (“Palmetto”) was, at all times relevant to this action, the “regional home health intermediary” or fiscal intermediary that administered Medicare’s home health and hospice benefits in Tennessee.”
Rocky Mountain Health Maint. Org., Inc. v. Price, 297 F. Supp. 3d 152 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “The Administrator did not, however, respond to that argument in its decision, which it issued more than two weeks after the 60-day period expired.”
Wilson v. Edelman, 542 F.2d 1260 (7th Cir. 1976). “42 U.S.C. § 1385 (a)(2). The Supplemental Security Income Program substantially displaced the former federal and state programs providing assistance to the aged, blind, and disabled.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.