U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 136— VIOLENT CRIME CONTROL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER IX— STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT › Part Part A— DNA Identification

42 U.S.C. § 14132

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 79 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2002–2026 · leading case: United States v. Kriesel, 508 F.3d 941 (9th Cir. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Kriesel, 508 F.3d 941 (9th Cir. 2007). · cites it 10× “42 U.S.C. § 14132 (d)(1)(A)(i). Thus, once Kriesel's DNA is placed within CODIS, it will remain there permanently and can be continually accessed and searched so long as the search is conducted by Federal, State or local "criminal justice agencies for law enforcement…”
Banks v. United States, 490 F.3d 1178 (10th Cir. 2007). · cites it 7× “42 U.S.C. § 14132 (a). CODIS “allows State and local forensics laboratories to exchange and compare DNA profiles electronically in an attempt to link evidence from crime scenes for which there are no suspects to DNA samples of convicted offenders on file in the system.”
Boroian v. Mueller, 616 F.3d 60 (1st Cir. 2010). · cites it 8× “42 U.S.C. § 14132 (a); Weikert, 504 F.3d at 3-4 .”
United States v. Pool, 621 F.3d 1213 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 11× “42 U.S.C. § 14132 (d)(1)(A). Pool and the amicus raise two objections.”
United States v. Earl Davis, 690 F.3d 226 (4th Cir. 2012). · cites it 4× “2d at 659 (citing 42 U.S.C. §§ 14132 (d)(1)(A)(i)-(ii); 42 U.”
United States v. Mitchell, 652 F.3d 387 (3rd Cir. 2011). · cites it 11× “42 U.S.C. § 14132 (c). Access to the "computer terminals/servers containing the CODIS software," which are "located in physically secure space at a criminal justice *408 agency," is restricted to "those individuals authorized to use CODIS and approved by the FBI.”
Johnson v. Quander, 370 F. Supp. 2d 79 (D.D.C. 2005). · cites it 6× “Background (A) Statutory History Under the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (“1994 Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 14132 , “Congress authorized the FBI to create a national index of [deoxyribonucleic acid (“DNA”) ] samples taken from convicted offenders, crime scenes and…”
United States v. Thomas Kriesel, Jr., 720 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2013). · cites it 9× “See 42 U.S.C. § 14132 (b)(3). Any person who knowingly uses a DNA sample or result without authorization is subject to criminal penalties.”
Johnson, Lamar v. Quander, Paul A., 440 F.3d 489 (D.C. Cir. 2006). · cites it 3× “” 42 U.S.C. § 14132 (b)(1). Using “short tandem repeat” (“STR”) technology, the government creates a “genetic fingerprint” for each donor by looking for the presence of genic variants known as alleles at thirteen specific loci on DNA present in the specimen.”
United States v. Thomas Cameron Kincade, 379 F.3d 813 (9th Cir. 2004). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. §§ 14132 (a)-(b). 9 As of March 2004, CODIS contained DNA profiles drawn from 1,641,-076 offenders and 78,475 crime scenes.”
Kaemmerling v. Lappin, 553 F.3d 669 (D.C. Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “” 42 U.S.C. § 14132 (a), (b)(3). Law enforcement officers use the CODIS to match one forensic crime scene sample to another, thereby connecting unsolved crimes through a common perpetrator, and to match evidence from the scene of a crime to a particular offender’s profile,…”
United States v. Davis, 657 F. Supp. 2d 630 (D. Maryland 2009). · cites it 5× “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 14132 (d) (1) (A) (i)-(ii); 42 U.”
Show all 79 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.