U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 136— VIOLENT CRIME CONTROL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER IX— STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT › Part Part A— DNA Identification

42 U.S.C. § 14135b

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 2003–2020 · leading case: Johnson v. Quander
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Johnson v. Quander (2005) dcd · cites it 10× “The plaintiff brings this action alleging that the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 14135b, (“the DNA Act”) and D.”
United States v. Thomas Cameron Kincade (2004) ca9 “Subsidiary provisions provide for collection and storage of DNA information from offenders subject to the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia, 42 U.S.C. § 14135b, and the Armed Forces, 10 U.”
Johnson, Lamar v. Quander, Paul A. (2006) cadc “” 42 U.S.C. § 14135b(a)(2). Congress left to the District of Columbia the responsibility of determining which offenses should be deemed “qualifying District of Columbia offenses.”
Silver v. Greater Baltimore Med. Ctr. (2020) mdctspecapp “…submitting Quander’s DNA information to a DNA database pursuant to the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 14135b. The court held that there was no private cause of action to enforce §§ 1320d-5–d-6. 37”
Leach v. U.S. Parole Commission (2007) dcd “42 U.S.C. § 14135b(a)(2). In addition, it authorizes the Bureau of Prisons or CSOSA to "use or authorize the use of such means as are reasonably necessary to detain, restrain, and collect a DNA sample from an individual who refuses to cooperate in the collection of the sample,”…”
Word v. United States Probation Department (2006) scd “The plaintiff, Jerry Word, initiated this action alleging that the DNA Analysis Backlog’Elimination Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 14135b (“the DNA Act”) violates the warrant requirement of the ' Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution; violates the* special needs exception…”
United States v. Curtis (2003) nywd “” 42 U.S.C. § 14135b(a)(2). Subsection (d) of § 14135b defines a “qualifying Federal offense.”
SHEPARDSON R. BLAIR v. UNITED STATES (2015) dc · cites it 4× “§ 14135a (a)(1)(B), or of a “qualifying District of Columbia offense,” 42 U.S.C. § 14135b (a)(1). The Act further requires the Director of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia (“CSOSA”) to do the same with “each individual under the…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 14135b(a)(1) — 1 case
Johnson v. Quander (2005) dcd “The plaintiff brings this action alleging that the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 14135b, (“the DNA Act”) and D.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 14135b(a)(2) — 3 cases
Johnson, Lamar v. Quander, Paul A. (2006) cadc “” 42 U.S.C. § 14135b(a)(2). Congress left to the District of Columbia the responsibility of determining which offenses should be deemed “qualifying District of Columbia offenses.”
Leach v. U.S. Parole Commission (2007) dcd “42 U.S.C. § 14135b(a)(2). In addition, it authorizes the Bureau of Prisons or CSOSA to "use or authorize the use of such means as are reasonably necessary to detain, restrain, and collect a DNA sample from an individual who refuses to cooperate in the collection of the sample,”…”
United States v. Curtis (2003) nywd “” 42 U.S.C. § 14135b(a)(2). Subsection (d) of § 14135b defines a “qualifying Federal offense.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 14135b(a)(3) — 1 case
Johnson v. Quander (2005) dcd “The plaintiff brings this action alleging that the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 14135b, (“the DNA Act”) and D.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 14135b(a)(l) — 1 case
Johnson v. Quander (2005) dcd “The plaintiff brings this action alleging that the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 14135b, (“the DNA Act”) and D.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 14135b(b) — 1 case
Johnson v. Quander (2005) dcd “The plaintiff brings this action alleging that the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 14135b, (“the DNA Act”) and D.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 14135b(c)(2) — 1 case
Johnson v. Quander (2005) dcd “The plaintiff brings this action alleging that the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 14135b, (“the DNA Act”) and D.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 14135b(d) — 1 case
Johnson v. Quander (2005) dcd “The plaintiff brings this action alleging that the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 14135b, (“the DNA Act”) and D.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 14135b(e)(2) — 1 case
Johnson v. Quander (2005) dcd “The plaintiff brings this action alleging that the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. § 14135b, (“the DNA Act”) and D.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.