U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 9— HOUSING OF PERSONS ENGAGED IN NATIONAL DEFENSE › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER IV— GENERAL PROVISIONS AFFECTING SUBCHAPTERS II TO VII

42 U.S.C. § 1547

Preservation of local civil and criminal jurisdiction and civil rights

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the acquisition by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development of any real property pursuant to subchapters II to VII of this chapter shall not deprive any State or political subdivision thereof, including any Territory or possession of the United States, of its civil and criminal jurisdiction in and over such property, or impair the civil rights under the State or local law of the inhabitants on such property. As used in this section the term “State” shall include the District of Columbia.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1944–2001 · leading case: United States v. City of Chester, 144 F.2d 415 (3rd Cir. 1944).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. City of Chester, 144 F.2d 415 (3rd Cir. 1944). “The City of Philadelphia and National Institute of Municipal Law Officers as amici lay emphasis on Section 10 of the Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1547 , which provides that the acquisition by the Administrator of real property shall not deprive any state or political…”
United States v. City of St. Paul, 258 F.3d 750 (8th Cir. 2001). “1944), where a nearly identical statute, the then existing version of 42 U.S.C. § 1547 , was interpreted. The purpose of the statute was to make clear that certain federal property as acquired was not to be considered a “federal enclave” so as to deprive the host state of all…”
Pub. Hous. Admin. v. Bristol Twp., 146 F. Supp. 859 (E.D. Pa. 1957). “” 42 U.S.C.A. § 1547 . 18 The Act recognizes that local governments will furnish services to projects such as Bristol Terrace I for which Congress provided compensation should be made.”
United States v. City of St. Paul (8th Cir. 2001). “1944), where a nearly identical statute, the then existing version of 42 U.S.C. § 1547 , was interpreted. The purpose of the statute was to make clear that certain federal property as acquired was not to be considered a “federal enclave” so as to -6- deprive the host state of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.