42 U.S.C. § 1603
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2002–2003 · leading case: Jeff Kasarsky v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 335 F.3d 539 (7th Cir. 2003).
Jeff Kasarsky v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 335 F.3d 539 (7th Cir. 2003). “§§ 216 (i), 223(d), and for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) under Title XVI of the Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1603 , 1614(a)(30). After preliminary agency proceedings, an administrative law judge (ALJ) found that he was not disabled and thus not entitled to benefits under either…”
Menachem v. Frydman-Menachem, 240 F. Supp. 2d 437 (D. Maryland 2003). “” 42 U.S.C. § 1603 (e)(1)(A). Petitioner must prove that: (1) the children were “habitually resident” in Israel at the time of the alleged wrongful retention; (2) the wrongful retention was in breach of Petitioner’s custody rights under the laws of the state of the children’s…”
Kasarsky, Jeff v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B. (7th Cir. 2003). “§§ 216 (I), 223(d), and for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) under Title XVI of the Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1603 , 1614(a)(30). After preliminary agency proceedings, an administrative law judge (ALJ) found that he was not disabled and thus not entitled to benefits under either…”
Kasarsky v. Barnhart, 32 F. App'x 761 (7th Cir. 2002). “§§ 216 (1), 223(d), and for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) under Title XVI of the Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1603 , 1614(a)(30). After preliminary agency proceedings, an administrative law judge (ALJ) found that he was not disabled and thus not entitled to benefits under either…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.