42 U.S.C. § 16911
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 303
cases (12 in the last 5 years), 2007–2026 · leading case: United States v. Nazario Gonzalez-Medina, 757 F.3d 425 (5th Cir. 2014).
United States v. Nazario Gonzalez-Medina, 757 F.3d 425 (5th Cir. 2014). “” See 42 U.S.C. § 16911 (5)(A)(i). SORNA includes an exception to its definition of “sex offense” for “[a]n offense involving consensual sexual conduct .”
United States v. Thomas Faulls, Sr., 821 F.3d 502 (4th Cir. 2016). “The district court sentenced Faulls to 295 months’ imprisonment and also required him to register as a sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), 42 U.S.C. § 16911 et seq. On appeal, Faulls contends that his counsel was ineffective in opening…”
United States v. Brian Berry, 814 F.3d 192 (4th Cir. 2016). “Using the categorical approach, which we hold applicable here, and comparing his state court conviction for endangering the welfare of a child to the generic offenses enumerated in 42 U.S.C. § 16911 (4)(A), we must agree: the district court erred in deeming Defendant a tier III…”
Privett v. Sec'y, Dep't of Homeland Sec., 865 F.3d 375 (6th Cir. 2017). “” 42 U.S.C. § 16911 (7)(H), (I); see also 8 U.”
United States v. Dodge, 597 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 2010). “Dodge objected, arguing that he was not a “sex offender” because his offense was not a “sex offense” as defined by 42 U.S.C. § 16911 (5)(A) and - (7). Overruling Dodge’s objection at sentencing, the district court found that the statute’s expanded definition of “sex offense”…”
State v. Moir, 794 S.E.2d 685 (N.C. 2016). “Abusive sexual contact is considered to be a Tier II offense under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 16911 (3)(A)(iv). 13. The registration for Tier II offenses under the provisions of the Jacob Wetterling Act, 42 U.”
United States v. Antwain Price, 777 F.3d 700 (4th Cir. 2015). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 16911 (1), 16913. If a sex offender *704 changes his residence, employment, or student status, he must update his registration within three business days, so that the sex offender registry remains current.”
United States v. Nicholas Schofield, 802 F.3d 722 (5th Cir. 2015). “Schofield contended that, because his offense is neither an enumerated federal offense nor a “specified offense against a minor” under 42 U.S.C. § 16911 (5)(A), it is not a sex offense and therefore he is not required to register as a sex offender under SORNA.”
United States v. Jeffrey Stock, 685 F.3d 621 (6th Cir. 2012). “5(a)(1) (2009); 42 U.S.C. § 16911 (4). Stock’s base offense level—reduced by three levels for acceptance of responsibility and combined with Stock’s criminal-history category of VI—yielded an advisory Guidelines range of 33 to 41 months’ imprisonment.”
State v. Petersen-Beard, 377 P.3d 1127 (Kan. 2016). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 16911 (10); 16918(a) (2012).”
United States v. White, 782 F.3d 1118 (10th Cir. 2015). “White as a “tier III” sex offender under 42 U.S.C. § 16911 , giving him a base offense level of 16.”
United States v. Cabrera-Gutierrez, 756 F.3d 1125 (9th Cir. 2013). “He argued that his prior conviction only qualified him as a Tier I sex offender, not a Tier III offender, because his Oregon conviction was not comparable to, or more severe than, “aggravated sexual abuse or sexual abuse,” as defined in 42 U.S.C. § 16911 . The district court…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 16911(4)(A)(i) — 1 case
United States v. Scott Cammorto, 859 F.3d 311 (4th Cir. 2017).
— 42 U.S.C. § 16911(5) — 1 case
United States v. Theofanis Mavroudis, 587 F. App'x 46 (4th Cir. 2014).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.