U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 20A— CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION

42 U.S.C. § 1975a

Duties of Commission

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) GenerallyThe Commission—(1) shall investigate allegations in writing under oath or affirmation relating to deprivations—(A) because of color, race, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin; or(B) as a result of any pattern or practice of fraud;of the right of citizens of the United States to vote and have votes counted; and(2) shall—(A) study and collect information relating to;(B) make appraisals of the laws and policies of the Federal Government with respect to;(C) serve as a national clearinghouse for information relating to; and(D) prepare public service announcements and advertising campaigns to discourage;discrimination or denials of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution of the United States because of color, race, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice.(b) Limitations on investigatory duties

Nothing in this chapter or any other Act shall be construed as authorizing the Commission, its advisory committees, or any person under its supervision or control, to inquire into or investigate any membership practices or internal operations of any fraternal organization, any college or university fraternity or sorority, any private club, or any religious organization.

(c) Reports(1) Annual report

The Commission shall submit to the President and Congress at least one report annually that monitors Federal civil rights enforcement efforts in the United States.

(2) Other reports generally

The Commission shall submit such other reports to the President and the Congress as the Commission, the Congress, or the President shall deem appropriate.

(d) Advisory committees

The Commission may constitute such advisory committees as it deems advisable. The Commission shall establish at least one such committee in each State and the District of Columbia composed of citizens of that State or District.

(e) Hearings and ancillary matters(1) Power to hold hearings

The Commission, or on the authorization of the Commission, any subcommittee of two or more members of the Commission, at least one of whom shall be of each major political party, may, for the purpose of carrying out this chapter, hold such hearings and act at such times and places as the Commission or such authorized subcommittee deems advisable. Each member of the Commission shall have the power to administer oaths and affirmations in connection with the proceedings of the Commission. The holding of a hearing by the Commission or the appointment of a subcommittee to hold a hearing pursuant to this paragraph must be approved by a majority of the Commission, or by a majority of the members present at a meeting when a quorum is present.

(2) Power to issue subpoenas

The Commission may issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and the production of written or other matter. Such a subpoena may not require the presence of a witness more than 100 miles outside the place wherein the witness is found or resides or is domiciled or transacts business, or has appointed an agent for receipt of service of process. In case of contumacy or refusal to obey a subpoena, the Attorney General may in a Federal court of appropriate jurisdiction obtain an appropriate order to enforce the subpoena.

(3) Witness fees

A witness attending any proceeding of the Commission shall be paid the same fees and mileage that are paid witnesses in the courts of the United States.

(4) Depositions and interrogatories

The Commission may use depositions and written interrogatories to obtain information and testimony about matters that are the subject of a Commission hearing or report.

(f) Limitation relating to abortion

Nothing in this chapter or any other Act shall be construed as authorizing the Commission, its advisory committees, or any other person under its supervision or control to study and collect, make appraisals of, or serve as a clearinghouse for any information about laws and policies of the Federal Government or any other governmental authority in the United States, with respect to abortion.

(Pub. L. 98–183, § 3, Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1302; Pub. L. 102–167, § 5, Nov. 26, 1991, 105 Stat. 1101; Pub. L. 103–419, § 2, Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4339.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 1975a, Pub. L. 85–315, pt. I, § 102, Sept. 9, 1957, 71 Stat. 634; Pub. L. 88–352, title V, § 501, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 249; Pub. L. 91–521, § 4, Nov. 25, 1970, 84 Stat. 1357; Pub. L. 92–496, § 1, Oct. 14, 1972, 86 Stat. 813, established rules of procedure for Commission. See Codification note set out preceding section 1975 of this title.

Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–419 amended section generally, substituting provisions relating to duties of Commission for provisions relating to rules of procedure of Commission hearings.

1991—Subsecs. (a), (d), (f). Pub. L. 102–167 substituted “Chairperson” for “Chairman” wherever appearing.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1959–2020 · leading case: Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020). · cites it 2× “§708 (a)(2) (Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant; Nondiscrimina- tion Provisions)  42 U. S. C. §1975a(a) (Duties of Civil Rights Commission)  42 U.”
Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420 (1960). · cites it 5× “" 42 U. S. C. § 1975a (e). Yet these safeguards, given as a matter of grace, do not in my judgment dispose of the constitutional difficulty.”
United States of Am. Ex Rel. Gerardo Catena v. Albert Elias, Superintendent of Youth Reception & Corr. Ctr. at Yardville, N. J, 465 F.2d 765 (3rd Cir. 1972). · cites it 5× “” 42 U.S.C. § 1975a(c). As in the case of the New Jersey Commission, this right was subject to reasonable limitations, for the chairman could “punish breaches of order and decorum and unprofessional ethics on the part of counsel, by censure and exclusion from the hearings.”
Larche v. Hannah, 177 F. Supp. 816 (W.D. La. 1959). · cites it 2× “On their own, they adopted a rule denying to the parties investigated the right of cross-examination.”
United States v. Wilson, Victoria, 290 F.3d 347 (D.C. Cir. 2002). “Because we agree with appellants that Wilson’s term had expired, we reverse the District Court and remand with instructions for it to enter summary judgment for the appellants. I. Background The United States Commission on Civil Rights (“the Commission”) is charged with…”
Pennsylvania Crime Comm'n v. Nacrelli, 5 Pa. Commw. 551 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1972). “See 42 U.S.C.A. §1975a(e). Other rights were and are accorded by the Civil Rights Act but not afforded by the Pennsylvania Commission’s rules, which we will not detail because they would overburden this opinion.”
Chi Iota Colony of Alpha Epsilon Pi Fraternity v. City Univ. of New York, 443 F. Supp. 2d 374 (E.D.N.Y 2006). “” 42 U.S.C. § 1975a(b). Like Title IX, this exclusion gives legitimacy to the single-sex status of fraternities and sororities.”
Larche v. Hannah, 176 F. Supp. 791 (W.D. La. 1959). · cites it 2× “Second, while the statute creating the Commission inferentially permits it to adopt reasonable Rules, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1975a (b), there is no provision whatsoever in the law to the effect that such Rules may include those here complained of, which plainly violate plaintiffs’ basic…”
Proposed Legislation to Grant Additional Power to the President's Comm'n on Organized Crime (OLC 1983). “33 In addition to these item s, Congress m ay also consider adding restraints sim ilar to those placed on the C ivil R ights C om m ission, w hich must, am o n g other things, perm it w itnesses to present a written statement, be represented by counsel and to answer defam atory…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1975a(a) — 1 case
Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020). “§708 (a)(2) (Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant; Nondiscrimina- tion Provisions)  42 U. S. C. §1975a(a) (Duties of Civil Rights Commission)  42 U.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1975a(a)(l) — 1 case
United States v. Wilson, Victoria, 290 F.3d 347 (D.C. Cir. 2002). “Because we agree with appellants that Wilson’s term had expired, we reverse the District Court and remand with instructions for it to enter summary judgment for the appellants. I. Background The United States Commission on Civil Rights (“the Commission”) is charged with…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1975a(b) — 1 case
Chi Iota Colony of Alpha Epsilon Pi Fraternity v. City Univ. of New York, 443 F. Supp. 2d 374 (E.D.N.Y 2006). “” 42 U.S.C. § 1975a(b). Like Title IX, this exclusion gives legitimacy to the single-sex status of fraternities and sororities.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1975a(c) — 2 cases
United States of Am. Ex Rel. Gerardo Catena v. Albert Elias, Superintendent of Youth Reception & Corr. Ctr. at Yardville, N. J, 465 F.2d 765 (3rd Cir. 1972). “” 42 U.S.C. § 1975a(c). As in the case of the New Jersey Commission, this right was subject to reasonable limitations, for the chairman could “punish breaches of order and decorum and unprofessional ethics on the part of counsel, by censure and exclusion from the hearings.”
Proposed Legislation to Grant Additional Power to the President's Comm'n on Organized Crime (OLC 1983). “33 In addition to these item s, Congress m ay also consider adding restraints sim ilar to those placed on the C ivil R ights C om m ission, w hich must, am o n g other things, perm it w itnesses to present a written statement, be represented by counsel and to answer defam atory…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1975a(d) — 1 case
United States of Am. Ex Rel. Gerardo Catena v. Albert Elias, Superintendent of Youth Reception & Corr. Ctr. at Yardville, N. J, 465 F.2d 765 (3rd Cir. 1972). “” 42 U.S.C. § 1975a(c). As in the case of the New Jersey Commission, this right was subject to reasonable limitations, for the chairman could “punish breaches of order and decorum and unprofessional ethics on the part of counsel, by censure and exclusion from the hearings.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1975a(e) — 2 cases
Pennsylvania Crime Comm'n v. Nacrelli, 5 Pa. Commw. 551 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1972). “See 42 U.S.C.A. §1975a(e). Other rights were and are accorded by the Civil Rights Act but not afforded by the Pennsylvania Commission’s rules, which we will not detail because they would overburden this opinion.”
United States of Am. Ex Rel. Gerardo Catena v. Albert Elias, Superintendent of Youth Reception & Corr. Ctr. at Yardville, N. J, 465 F.2d 765 (3rd Cir. 1972). “” 42 U.S.C. § 1975a(c). As in the case of the New Jersey Commission, this right was subject to reasonable limitations, for the chairman could “punish breaches of order and decorum and unprofessional ethics on the part of counsel, by censure and exclusion from the hearings.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1975a(f) — 1 case
United States of Am. Ex Rel. Gerardo Catena v. Albert Elias, Superintendent of Youth Reception & Corr. Ctr. at Yardville, N. J, 465 F.2d 765 (3rd Cir. 1972). “” 42 U.S.C. § 1975a(c). As in the case of the New Jersey Commission, this right was subject to reasonable limitations, for the chairman could “punish breaches of order and decorum and unprofessional ethics on the part of counsel, by censure and exclusion from the hearings.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1975a(h) — 1 case
United States of Am. Ex Rel. Gerardo Catena v. Albert Elias, Superintendent of Youth Reception & Corr. Ctr. at Yardville, N. J, 465 F.2d 765 (3rd Cir. 1972). “” 42 U.S.C. § 1975a(c). As in the case of the New Jersey Commission, this right was subject to reasonable limitations, for the chairman could “punish breaches of order and decorum and unprofessional ethics on the part of counsel, by censure and exclusion from the hearings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.