42 U.S.C. § 1997d
Prohibition of retaliation
No person reporting conditions which may constitute a violation under this subchapter shall be subjected to retaliation in any manner for so reporting.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30
cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case: Patel v. Moron
Patel v. Moron (2012)
“nt to the United States Constitution; (2) violation of the Eighth AmendmenVDue Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution arising out of his solitary confinement; (3) retaliation in violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution;…”
Miller v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (2010)
“Although the complaint is far from clear, a liberal reading suggests that Miller might have intended to assert claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1997d, the APA, and the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution.”
Bieros v. Nicola (1994)
“42 U.S.C. § 1997d 42 U.S.C. § 1997d prohibits retaliation against persons reporting conditions which violate 42 U.”
Weisman v. New Jersey Department of Human Services (2011)
“In Count II of the Complaint, Weisman alleges that she was retaliated against in violation of the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (“CRIPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1997d, which provides: “[n]o person reporting conditions which may constitute a violation under this subchapter…”
James Patrick Price v. Thomas H. Brittain, Jr. (1989)
“Private Suits for Whistle-Blowers? Price’s remaining theory for recovery asserts that he has a private right of action, under 42 U.S.C. § 1997d, for having “blown the whistle” to outside authorities regarding drug-pushing and maltreatment of patients at the facility.”
Walter Chruby v. Annette Kowaleski (2013)
“*159 Based upon the incident with Thomas and the subsequent hearing, Chruby filed a complaint stating eight causes of action, alleging violations of his First Amendment rights, of his right to equal protection, and of 42 U.S.C. § 1997d. The complaint also alleges that the…”
Bieros v. Nicola (1994)
“Plaintiff now seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997d, which prohibits retaliation against institutionalized persons.”
Stone-El v. Fairman (1991)
“Additionally, Stone-El's amended complaint attempts to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1997d. Section 1997d provides that "[n]o person reporting conditions which may constitute a violation under (the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.”
Lewis v. Washington (2000)
“See 42 U.S.C. § 1997d (“No person reporting conditions which may constitute a violation under this subchapter shall be subjected to retaliation____”).”
Bieros v. Nicola (1993)
“§§ 1983 , 1985 and 1986, as well as violations of the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997d. Defendants consist of the Chief of the Bridgeport Police Department, six police officers, four attorneys in the Montgomery County Public Defender’s Office, the…”
Ennis v. Schuetzle (1992)
“See also Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997d: “No person reporting conditions which may constitute a violation under this subchapter shall be subjected to retaliation in any manner for so reporting.”
Bieros v. Nicola (1994)
“42 U.S.C. § 1997d. 3 . Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 1997d(3) — 1 case
Ilick v. Miller (1999)
— 42 U.S.C. § 1997d(a)(1) — 1 case
Brown v. Pead (2000)
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.