42 U.S.C. § 1997i

Disclaimer respecting standards of care

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

Provisions of this subchapter shall not authorize promulgation of regulations defining standards of care.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2024 · leading case: United States v. Illinois, 803 F. Supp. 1338 (N.D. Ill. 1992).
United States v. Illinois, 803 F. Supp. 1338 (N.D. Ill. 1992). · cites it 2× “Next, Defendants assert that this lawsuit is prohibited by 42 U.S.C. § 1997i (1981), which provides that CRIPA does “not authorize promulgation of regulations defining standards of care.”
United States v. State of Ill., 803 F. Supp. 1338 (N.D. Ill. 1992). · cites it 2× “Next, Defendants assert that this lawsuit is prohibited by 42 U.S.C. § 1997i (1981), which provides that CRIPA does "not authorize promulgation of regulations defining standards of care.”
Pugmire v. Penzone (D. Ariz. 2024). “§ 1997g. She alleges that 16 MCSO and appropriate authorities have not “made correct use of funds .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.