U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 24— DISPOSAL OF ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITIES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY AND PRIORITIES

42 U.S.C. § 2333

Transfer of priorities

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
No priority shall be transferable, except—(a) a husband and wife may exercise a priority in their joint names;(b) a religious organization may exercise the priority which would otherwise belong to its priest, minister, or rabbi, regardless of whether that position happens to be filled at the time of the exercise of the priority;(c) two or more priority holders having a common interest in a building or location may assign their interests to a single assignee; and(d) the Commission may permit such other transfers as it finds to be fair and equitable.(Aug. 4, 1955, ch. 543, ch. 4, § 43, 69 Stat. 476.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesTransfer of Functions

Atomic Energy Commission abolished and functions transferred by sections 5814 and 5841 of this title. See also Transfer of Functions notes set out under those sections.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2002–2020 · leading case: Cirino Encarnacion v. Concilio De Salud Integral De Loiza, Inc., 206 F. Supp. 2d 251 (D.P.R. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cirino Encarnacion v. Concilio De Salud Integral De Loiza, Inc., 206 F. Supp. 2d 251 (D.P.R. 2002). “, and as such has been provided with liability protection under the Federal Tort Claims Act, (“FTCA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2333 (g) and 233(g)(1)(A); 28 U.”
(PS) Korte v. State of California (E.D. Cal. 2020). “C § 12101, 12112, 14 12203, 12182), “Terrorism” (citing to 42 U.S.C. § 2333 (a)), “Torture” (42 U.S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.