42 U.S.C. § 2670

Repealed. Pub. L. 94–103, title III, § 302(c), Oct. 4, 1975, 89 Stat. 507

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1973–1984 · leading case: United States v. Robert Mattson, 600 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir. 1979).
United States v. Robert Mattson, 600 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir. 1979). “Provisions pertinent to this case were found at 42 U.S.C. §§ 2670 -2677c. These were subsequently repealed or incorporated into 42 U.”
New York State Ass'n for Retarded Child., Inc. v. Rockefeller, 357 F. Supp. 752 (E.D.N.Y 1973). “Federal Statutory Rights Plaintiffs assert that there is a federal interest in the case because of Congressional programs to return retarded persons to useful lives in the community ( 42 U.S.C. §§ 2670 -2677c), and because of provisions in Title XIX of the Social Security Act…”
Cospito v. Heckler, 742 F.2d 72 (3rd Cir. 1984). “282 (1963), codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 2670 -2697b. Congress has further evidenced its continuing concern for the welfare of the developmentally disabled in the Developmentally Disabled Assistance and Bill of Rights Act of 1975, amending 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.