For the purpose of facilitating the economical and efficient conduct of operations in the National Institutes of Health which are financed by two or more appropriations where the costs of operation are not readily susceptible of distribution as charges to such appropriations, there is established the National Institutes of Health Management Fund. Such amounts as the Director of the National Institutes of Health may determine to represent a reasonable distribution of estimated costs among the various appropriations involved may be advanced each year to this fund and shall be available for expenditure for such costs under such regulations as may be prescribed by said Director, including the operation of facilities for the sale of meals to employees and others at rates to be determined by said Director to be sufficient to cover the reasonable value of the meals served and the proceeds thereof shall be deposited to the credit of this fund: Provided, That funds advanced to this fund shall be available only in the fiscal year in which they are advanced: Provided further, That final adjustments of advances in accordance with actual costs shall be effected wherever practicable with the appropriations from which such funds are advanced.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
16
cases, 1973–2011 · leading case:
In re Romance M., 622 A.2d 1047 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993).
In re Romance M., 622 A.2d 1047 (Conn. App. Ct. 1993).
· cites it 4× “’s physical condition was such that the trial court asked Coleman, who was in the courtroom, to testify as to her condition then and there. Coleman concluded that Gail M.”
Dickson v. City of Memphis Civil Serv. Comm'n, 194 S.W.3d 457 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
“The trial court found that the positive drug test, which provided the only substantial and material evidence for Appellee’s termination, was inadmissible as evidence for failure of the City failed to comport with 42 U.S.C. § 290 . We affirm. On March 30, 2001, Morris Dickson…”
Grimes v. United States Postal Serv., 872 F. Supp. 668 (W.D. Mo. 1994).
· cites it 2× “Grimes claimed that defendant terminated his employment because of a “handicapping condition,” unreasonably and in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 290 and the Rehabilitation Act.”
Danielson v. Superior Court, 754 P.2d 1145 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1988).
· cites it 2× “Following a hearing the trial court granted the motion, finding that the information sought was relevant, that Danielson waived any privilege claimed by releasing the medical records to BOMEX, and that good cause for release was shown pursuant to 42 U.S. C. § 290. Accordingly,…”
Notaro v. Fossil Indus., Inc., 820 F. Supp. 2d 452 (E.D.N.Y 2011).
“Thereafter, on May 12, 2009, the Plaintiffs commenced the present action against Fossil and Bianco, claiming violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 290 et seq., and New York State Human Rights Law, N.”
State v. Friend, 385 N.W.2d 313 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986).
“2(b) violates federal policy and 42 U.S.C. § 290 dd-3 (Supp.1985) and 38 U.”
Ctr. for Legal Advocacy v. Earnest, 188 F. Supp. 2d 1251 (D. Colo. 2002).
“Therefore, the “Access Agreement” did not grant relief in favor of Defendants’ counterclaim, and it did not prejudice the Plaintiff.”
Freeman v. Etherton, 773 So. 2d 431 (Ala. 2000).
“(setting out Alabama’s psychotherapist-patient privilege); 2) that federal law, specifically 42 U.S.C. § 290 and 42 C.F.R. §§ 2.63 and 2.”
Young v. Joy, 30 So. 3d 1116 (La. Ct. App. 2010).
“However, this argument is of no moment as the records of Savoy Medical Center relating to her substance abuse were admittedly obtained via Ms. Young signing a medical records release specifically allowing the release of medical records protected under federal law, including…”
Cox v. Miller, 154 F. Supp. 2d 787 (S.D.N.Y. 2001).
“Petitioner cites 42 U.S.C. § 290 dd-2, which provides for limited confidentiality of records of a substance abuse program or activity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.