Notes of Decisions
Reg'l Mgmt. Corp. v. Legal Servs. Corp., 186 F.3d 457 (4th Cir. 1999).
· cites it 12× “, do not provide a basis for reviewing Legal Services' decision, see 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(e)(1), it followed the lead of several courts that have nonetheless found authority to review certain Legal Services actions under a pre-APA standard of review, which requires a court to…”
Wilkinson v. Legal Servs. Corp., 27 F. Supp. 2d 32 (D.D.C. 1998).
· cites it 8× “See 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(a). The Board may also appoint “such other officers as [it] determines to be necessary.”
Lebron v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 513 U.S. 374 (1995).
· cites it 2× “§ 396 (b) (Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB)); 42 U. S. C. § 2996d(e)(1) (Legal Services Corporation (LSC)), and though not subjected to the restrictions of the GCCA, were (unlike Comsat) managed by boards of directors on which Government appointees had not just a few…”
Newman v. Legal Servs. Corp., 628 F. Supp. 535 (D.D.C. 1986).
· cites it 3× “§ 2996d(g), and LSC is prohibited from terminating recipients of its funds without providing notice and an opportunity for a hearing before a hearing examiner, see 42 U.”
Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc. v. Legal Servs. Corp., 940 F.2d 685 (D.C. Cir. 1991).
· cites it 2× “Chevron's Applicability to LSC Rule-making LSC is a federally-chartered nonprofit corporation of the District of Columbia. See LSCA § 1003, 42 U.S.C. § 2996b.”
Flores v. Flores, 598 P.2d 893 (Alaska 1979).
· cites it 2× “§ 2996c(c); 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(e)(1). Spokane County Legal Services, Inc.”
Hedges v. Legal Servs. Corp., 663 F. Supp. 300 (N.D. Cal. 1987).
· cites it 5× “Specifically, the Corporation argues that plaintiff relies on 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(b)(2) when stating several of his causes of action.”
Neighborhood Legal Servs., Inc. v. Legal Servs. Corp., 466 F. Supp. 1148 (D. Conn. 1979).
· cites it 2× “The legislation creating the Corporation provides that the Corporation shall not be considered an agency of the Federal Government, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2996d(e)(l), and it is therefore exempt from the general coverage of the Administrative Procedure Act, including the A.”
Multnomah Legal Servs. Workers Union v. Legal Servs. Corp., 936 F.2d 1547 (9th Cir. 1991).
· cites it 3× “Although LSC grants and administers federal funds, the LSC Act specifically provides: [Ojfficers and employees of [LSC] shall not be considered officers and employees, and [LSC] shall not be considered a department, agency, or instrumentality of the Federal Government.”
Grassley v. Legal Servs. Corp., 535 F. Supp. 818 (S.D. Iowa 1982).
“See 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(e)(1). While Congress specifically extended the coverage of several other federal statutes to the Corporation and its officers and employees, section 1913 was not so extended.”
Legal Servs. Corp., Etc. v. Ehrlich, 457 F. Supp. 1058 (D. Maryland 1978).
· cites it 2× “30 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(e)(l) provides: Except as otherwise specifically provided in this subchapter, officers and employees of the Corporation shall not be considered officers or employees, and the Corporation shall not be considered a department, agency, or instrumentality, of…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(a) — 1 case
Wilkinson v. Legal Servs. Corp., 27 F. Supp. 2d 32 (D.D.C. 1998).
“See 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(a). The Board may also appoint “such other officers as [it] determines to be necessary.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(b)(2) — 1 case
Hedges v. Legal Servs. Corp., 663 F. Supp. 300 (N.D. Cal. 1987).
“Specifically, the Corporation argues that plaintiff relies on 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(b)(2) when stating several of his causes of action.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(b)(l) — 1 case
Wilkinson v. Legal Servs. Corp., 27 F. Supp. 2d 32 (D.D.C. 1998).
“See 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(a). The Board may also appoint “such other officers as [it] determines to be necessary.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(e) — 3 cases
Hedges v. Legal Servs. Corp., 663 F. Supp. 300 (N.D. Cal. 1987).
“Specifically, the Corporation argues that plaintiff relies on 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(b)(2) when stating several of his causes of action.”
Multnomah Legal Servs. Workers Union v. Legal Servs. Corp., 936 F.2d 1547 (9th Cir. 1991).
“Although LSC grants and administers federal funds, the LSC Act specifically provides: [Ojfficers and employees of [LSC] shall not be considered officers and employees, and [LSC] shall not be considered a department, agency, or instrumentality of the Federal Government.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(e)(1) — 7 cases
Reg'l Mgmt. Corp. v. Legal Servs. Corp., 186 F.3d 457 (4th Cir. 1999).
“, do not provide a basis for reviewing Legal Services' decision, see 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(e)(1), it followed the lead of several courts that have nonetheless found authority to review certain Legal Services actions under a pre-APA standard of review, which requires a court to…”
Lebron v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 513 U.S. 374 (1995).
“§ 396 (b) (Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB)); 42 U. S. C. § 2996d(e)(1) (Legal Services Corporation (LSC)), and though not subjected to the restrictions of the GCCA, were (unlike Comsat) managed by boards of directors on which Government appointees had not just a few…”
Flores v. Flores, 598 P.2d 893 (Alaska 1979).
“§ 2996c(c); 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(e)(1). Spokane County Legal Services, Inc.”
Newman v. Legal Servs. Corp., 628 F. Supp. 535 (D.D.C. 1986).
“§ 2996d(g), and LSC is prohibited from terminating recipients of its funds without providing notice and an opportunity for a hearing before a hearing examiner, see 42 U.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(e)(l) — 14 cases
Reg'l Mgmt. Corp. v. Legal Servs. Corp., 186 F.3d 457 (4th Cir. 1999).
“, do not provide a basis for reviewing Legal Services' decision, see 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(e)(1), it followed the lead of several courts that have nonetheless found authority to review certain Legal Services actions under a pre-APA standard of review, which requires a court to…”
Wilkinson v. Legal Servs. Corp., 27 F. Supp. 2d 32 (D.D.C. 1998).
“See 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(a). The Board may also appoint “such other officers as [it] determines to be necessary.”
Lebron v. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 513 U.S. 374 (1995).
“§ 396 (b) (Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB)); 42 U. S. C. § 2996d(e)(1) (Legal Services Corporation (LSC)), and though not subjected to the restrictions of the GCCA, were (unlike Comsat) managed by boards of directors on which Government appointees had not just a few…”
Flores v. Flores, 598 P.2d 893 (Alaska 1979).
“§ 2996c(c); 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(e)(1). Spokane County Legal Services, Inc.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(f) — 3 cases
Wilkinson v. Legal Servs. Corp., 27 F. Supp. 2d 32 (D.D.C. 1998).
“See 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(a). The Board may also appoint “such other officers as [it] determines to be necessary.”
Hedges v. Legal Servs. Corp., 663 F. Supp. 300 (N.D. Cal. 1987).
“Specifically, the Corporation argues that plaintiff relies on 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(b)(2) when stating several of his causes of action.”
Multnomah Legal Servs. Workers Union v. Legal Servs. Corp., 936 F.2d 1547 (9th Cir. 1991).
“Although LSC grants and administers federal funds, the LSC Act specifically provides: [Ojfficers and employees of [LSC] shall not be considered officers and employees, and [LSC] shall not be considered a department, agency, or instrumentality of the Federal Government.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(g) — 5 cases
Reg'l Mgmt. Corp. v. Legal Servs. Corp., 186 F.3d 457 (4th Cir. 1999).
“, do not provide a basis for reviewing Legal Services' decision, see 42 U.S.C. § 2996d(e)(1), it followed the lead of several courts that have nonetheless found authority to review certain Legal Services actions under a pre-APA standard of review, which requires a court to…”
Newman v. Legal Servs. Corp., 628 F. Supp. 535 (D.D.C. 1986).
“§ 2996d(g), and LSC is prohibited from terminating recipients of its funds without providing notice and an opportunity for a hearing before a hearing examiner, see 42 U.”
Neighborhood Legal Servs., Inc. v. Legal Servs. Corp., 466 F. Supp. 1148 (D. Conn. 1979).
“The legislation creating the Corporation provides that the Corporation shall not be considered an agency of the Federal Government, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2996d(e)(l), and it is therefore exempt from the general coverage of the Administrative Procedure Act, including the A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.