42 U.S.C. § 300g
Coverage
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 42
cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Hartwell Corp. v. Superior Court, 38 P.3d 1098 (Cal. 2002).
Hartwell Corp. v. Superior Court, 38 P.3d 1098 (Cal. 2002). “(42 U.S.C. § 300g.) "Congress occupied the field of public drinking water regulation with its enactment of the [federal] SDWA.”
Jacobs Ranch, L.L.C. v. Smith, 2006 OK 34 (Okla. 2006). “The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designated a portion of the Arbuckle-Simpson Groundwater Basin as a sole source aquifer pursuant to the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300g and 300h-3 e. [3] There are a total of seventy-two designated sole…”
Green v. Ralee Eng'g Co., 960 P.2d 1046 (Cal. 1998). “, 42 U.S.C. § 300g et seq. [delegating to the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency the authority to issue safe drinking water regulations]; Health & Saf.”
City of Waukesha v. Env't Prot. Agency, 320 F.3d 228 (D.C. Cir. 2003). “BACKGROUND The SDWA generally applies to “each public water system in each State,” 42 U.S.C. § 300g, and authorizes EPA to set standards for drinking water contaminants therein, 42 U.”
State of Wyoming v. Zinke, 871 F.3d 1133 (10th Cir. 2017). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 300g et seq., 300h et seq. (respectively).”
Manufactured Hous. Inst. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 467 F.3d 391 (4th Cir. 2006). “” 42 U.S.C. § 300g; see generally 40 C.F.R.”
EQT Prod. Co. v. Wender, 191 F. Supp. 3d 583 (N.D.W. Va. 2016). “See 42 U.S.C. §§ 300g, 300h. “Class II” wells, which are used exclusively to inject fluids associated with natural gas and oil extraction, are the type at issue here.”
Coshow v. City of Escondido, 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8311 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005). “) in 1974 to establish uniform quality standards for the public water systems in the United States and to reduce contamination in drinking water. The federal SDWA prohibits states from enacting drinking water laws less stringent than those established by the Environmental…”
United States of Am., Plaintiff-Appellant(98-6609/6633)/cross-Appellee v. John David White, 270 F.3d 356 (6th Cir. 2001). “See 42 U.S.C. § 300g 3(a), (b), (g) (West 1999) (granting EPA Administrator authority to issue civil compliance order or commence civil action should the state with primary enforcement authority fail to commence appropriate enforcement action); 42 U.”
Hootstein v. Amherst-Pelham Reg'l Sch. Comm., 361 F. Supp. 3d 94 (D.D.C. 2019). “See 42 U.S.C. § 300g. Plaintiff argued the public water system is responsible for water in mains but is not responsible for water once it enters the pipes that carry water from the mains into buildings.”
Dep't of Labor & Indus. v. Heltzel, 90 A.3d 823 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2014). “2012) (OOR construed FERPA and 42 U.S.C. § 300g); Fort Cherry Sch. Dist.”
Kimberly Mattoon v. City of Pittsfield, 980 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1992). “The SDWA enables the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (“Administrator”) to “publish maximum contaminant level goals and promulgate national primary drinking water regulations.” Id. § 300g-l(b)(l). The maximum contaminant level is to “be set at the level at…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 300g(3) — 1 case
Manufactured Hous. Inst. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 467 F.3d 391 (4th Cir. 2006). “” 42 U.S.C. § 300g; see generally 40 C.F.R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.