42 U.S.C. § 3618
Authorization of appropriations
There are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out the purposes of this subchapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2024 · leading case: Barrett v. H & R Block, Inc., 652 F. Supp. 2d 104 (D. Mass. 2009).
Barrett v. H & R Block, Inc., 652 F. Supp. 2d 104 (D. Mass. 2009). “§ 1691e(f) (“No such action shall be brought later than two years from the date of the occurrence of the violation .”
Cabrera v. Jakabovitz, 24 F.3d 372 (2d Cir. 1994). “However, as for Breitman, who was charged and found liable only for violating Title VIII, the Court granted attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 3618 . A. Retroactive application of attorney’s fee amendment Until early 1989, a court could award attorney’s fees and costs to a…”
Bonita Hunt v. Goergia Dep't of Cmty. Affairs, 490 F. App'x 196 (11th Cir. 2012). “3 Although the FHA contains a statutory tolling provision, see 42 U.S.C. § 3618 (a)(1)(B), Hunt cites no authority for her contention that it extends to claims raised under the ADA or the Rehabilitation Act.”
Brower v. Roose (E.D. Mich. 2024). “Count 7 and 8 allege respective claims for retaliatory eviction under the FHA, 42 U.S.C. § 3618 , and the PWDCRA, M.C.L.”
Miley v. Principi, 15 Vet. App. 97 (Vet. App. 2001). “On May 29, 2001, while this appeal was still pending before this Court on remand from the Federal Circuit, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Buckhannon Bd. and Care Home v. West Virginia Dep’t of Health and Human Resources “that the ‘catalyst theory’ is not a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.