42 U.S.C. § 3701

Repealed. Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 602, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2077

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1971–2021 · leading case: Maine v. Thiboutot, 448 U.S. 1 (1980).
Maine v. Thiboutot, 448 U.S. 1 (1980). · cites it 2× “1167 , 42 U. S. C. § 3701 et seq. (1976 ed., Supp.”
Garcia v. San Antonio Metro. Transit Auth., 469 U.S. 528 (1985). · cites it 2× “197 , as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 3701 et seq.; the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, 88 Stat.”
Shapp v. Sloan, 391 A.2d 595 (Pa. 1978). · cites it 4× “197 , as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 3701 et seq. (1970 & Supp.), discussed infra.”
Elaine Easley Russell v. Law Enf't Assistance Admin. of the United States of Am., 637 F.2d 354 (5th Cir. 1981). · cites it 4× “197 (1968) (amended version at 42 U.S.C. §§ 3701 et seq. (1976)) (“Crime Control Act”).”
United States v. Richard Elrod, Sheriff, Cook Cnty., 627 F.2d 813 (7th Cir. 1980). · cites it 3× “Over the years, the Department has applied for and received federal funds from LEAA, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3701 et seq. Those funds have been used for the construction of correctional facilities and the implementation of correctional programs.”
Holt v. United States, 565 A.2d 970 (D.C. 1989). · cites it 2× “§§ 1201-1202 (1984), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3701 -3796c (1977). His proposal eventually became D.”
Hiram B. Ely v. Richard W. Velde, Associate Adm'r, Law Enf't Assistance Admin., Nat. Resources Def. Council, Amicus Curiae, 451 F.2d 1130 (4th Cir. 1971). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. § 3701 , et seq. 8 . The Safe Streets Act, which was passed in 1968, is an effort to “assist State and local governments in strengthening and improving law enforcement at every level by national assistance.”
Ely v. Velde, 321 F. Supp. 1088 (E.D. Va. 1971). · cites it 4× “The State of Virginia has requested, pursuant to the Safe Streets Act, 42 U. S.C. § 3701 et seq., a block grant, of which $775,000 has been applied for by the State Department of Welfare & Institutions.”
Russell B. Tafoya & Lydia Tafoya v. U.S. Dep't of Just., Law Enf't Assistance Admin., 748 F.2d 1389 (10th Cir. 1984). “The Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (Omnibus Act) ( 42 U.S.C. §§ 3701 -3796c (1976)) provided for federal funding only to “states and units *1391 of general local government.”
Houston Chronicle Publ'g Co. v. City of Houston, 531 S.W.2d 177 (Tex. App. 1975). “It is of legitimate interest to the prevention of crime that the law enforcement agencies have available the information provided by the National Crime Information Center system, which has been partially funded by the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration system.”
United States v. Alfred Lee Apodaca, 522 F.2d 568 (10th Cir. 1975). · cites it 2× “See 42 U.S.C. § 3701 et seq. The Fremont County sheriff’s office, acting through Fremont County, 5 applied to the Committee for, and received, financial assistance in the years 1972 and 1973.”
Saffold v. City of Chicago, 549 N.E.2d 671 (Ill. App. Ct. 1989). · cites it 2× “The LEAA was established by the Crime Control Act of 1973 ( 42 U.S.C. §3701 et seq. (1982)). The stated purpose of the Crime Control Act, which was later repealed, was “to assist State and local governments in strengthening and improving law enforcement and criminal justice at…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.