42 U.S.C. § 3701
Repealed. Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 602, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2077
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1971–2021 · leading case: Maine v. Thiboutot
Maine v. Thiboutot (1980)
“1167 , 42 U. S. C. § 3701 et seq. (1976 ed., Supp.”
Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority (1985)
“197 , as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 3701 et seq.; the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, 88 Stat.”
Shapp v. Sloan (1978)
“197 , as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 3701 et seq. (1970 & Supp.), discussed infra.”
Elaine Easley Russell v. Law Enforcement Assistance Administration of the United States of America (1981)
“197 (1968) (amended version at 42 U.S.C. §§ 3701 et seq. (1976)) (“Crime Control Act”).”
United States v. Richard Elrod, Sheriff, Cook County (1980)
“Over the years, the Department has applied for and received federal funds from LEAA, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3701 et seq. Those funds have been used for the construction of correctional facilities and the implementation of correctional programs.”
Holt v. United States (1989)
“§§ 1201-1202 (1984), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3701 -3796c (1977). His proposal eventually became D.”
Hiram B. Ely v. Richard W. Velde, Associate Administrator, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, Natural Resources (1971)
“42 U.S.C. § 3701 , et seq. 8 . The Safe Streets Act, which was passed in 1968, is an effort to “assist State and local governments in strengthening and improving law enforcement at every level by national assistance.”
Ely v. Velde (1971)
“The State of Virginia has requested, pursuant to the Safe Streets Act, 42 U. S.C. § 3701 et seq., a block grant, of which $775,000 has been applied for by the State Department of Welfare & Institutions.”
Russell B. Tafoya and Lydia Tafoya v. U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (1984)
“The Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (Omnibus Act) ( 42 U.S.C. §§ 3701 -3796c (1976)) provided for federal funding only to “states and units *1391 of general local government.”
Houston Chronicle Publishing Co. v. City of Houston (1975)
“It is of legitimate interest to the prevention of crime that the law enforcement agencies have available the information provided by the National Crime Information Center system, which has been partially funded by the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration system.”
United States v. Alfred Lee Apodaca (1975)
“See 42 U.S.C. § 3701 et seq. The Fremont County sheriff’s office, acting through Fremont County, 5 applied to the Committee for, and received, financial assistance in the years 1972 and 1973.”
Saffold v. City of Chicago (1989)
“The LEAA was established by the Crime Control Act of 1973 ( 42 U.S.C. §3701 et seq. (1982)). The stated purpose of the Crime Control Act, which was later repealed, was “to assist State and local governments in strengthening and improving law enforcement and criminal justice at…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.