42 U.S.C. § 3783
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1983–1984 · leading case: Nat'l Juv. Law Ctr., Inc. v. Alfred S. Regnery, Acting Adm'r, Off. of Juv. Just., 738 F.2d 455 (D.C. Cir. 1984).
Nat'l Juv. Law Ctr., Inc. v. Alfred S. Regnery, Acting Adm'r, Off. of Juv. Just., 738 F.2d 455 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “The administrative remedies to which the Law Center referred evidently encompass a hearing before the agency pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3783 (b) (1982) 3 (unless otherwise noted, all references to Title 42 of the United States Code are to the 1982 edition) and a rehearing pursuant…”
Russell B. Tafoya & Lydia Tafoya v. U.S. Dep't of Just., Law Enf't Assistance Admin., 748 F.2d 1389 (10th Cir. 1984). “1981) reads in pertinent part: (a) If any applicant or recipient is dissatisfied with a final action with respect to [ 42 U.S.C. §§ 3783 , 3784, or 3789d(c)(2)(G) ], such applicant or recipient may, within sixty days after notice of such action, file with the United States court…”
Nat'l Black Police Ass'n, Inc. v. Richard W. Velde, 712 F.2d 569 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “V 1975) (current version at 42 U.S.C. § 3783 (Supp. V 1981)) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.