42 U.S.C. § 3785
Repealed. Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, § 1155(3), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3114
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1980–1999 · leading case: Russell B. Tafoya and Lydia Tafoya v. U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration
Russell B. Tafoya and Lydia Tafoya v. U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (1984)
“It is this provision, 42 U.S.C. § 3785 (a) (Supp. V 1981), which Petitioners rely upon for review by this Court in this PSOBA case.”
Massachusetts Fair Share v. Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (1985)
“Our jurisdiction to review this decision is derived from 42 U.S.C. § 3785 (a) (1982). 3 . ACTION is an independent executive agency.”
Lankford v. Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (1980)
“96-157 (to be codified in 42 U.S.C. § 3785 ). Because these sections do not include the Act, it is clear that claimant would have no right to review in this court under the amended legislation.”
Davis v. United States (1999)
“4 Russell argued that jurisdiction was conferred by the judicial review provision of the statute, 42 U.S.C. § 3785 (a), 5 while the government maintained that § 3785(a) applies only to applications by state and local law enforcement agencies for grants and does not apply to…”
Wydra v. Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (1983)
“The claimant therefore relies on 42 U.S.C. § 3785 , 5 the provision governing appellate review under certain sections of chapter 46, concerning “Justice System Improvements,” in which the PSOBA is codified.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.