42 U.S.C. § 3785
Repealed. Pub. L. 109–162, title XI, § 1155(3), Jan. 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3114
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1980–1999 · leading case: Russell B. Tafoya & Lydia Tafoya v. U.S. Dep't of Just., Law Enf't Assistance Admin., 748 F.2d 1389 (10th Cir. 1984).
Russell B. Tafoya & Lydia Tafoya v. U.S. Dep't of Just., Law Enf't Assistance Admin., 748 F.2d 1389 (10th Cir. 1984). “It is this provision, 42 U.S.C. § 3785 (a) (Supp. V 1981), which Petitioners rely upon for review by this Court in this PSOBA case.”
Massachusetts Fair Share v. Law Enf't Assistance Admin., 758 F.2d 708 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “Our jurisdiction to review this decision is derived from 42 U.S.C. § 3785 (a) (1982). 3 . ACTION is an independent executive agency.”
Lankford v. Law Enf't Assistance Admin., 620 F.2d 35 (4th Cir. 1980). “96-157 (to be codified in 42 U.S.C. § 3785 ). Because these sections do not include the Act, it is clear that claimant would have no right to review in this court under the amended legislation.”
Davis v. United States, 169 F.3d 1196 (9th Cir. 1999). “4 Russell argued that jurisdiction was conferred by the judicial review provision of the statute, 42 U.S.C. § 3785 (a), 5 while the government maintained that § 3785(a) applies only to applications by state and local law enforcement agencies for grants and does not apply to…”
Wydra v. Law Enf't Assistance Admin., 722 F.2d 834 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “The claimant therefore relies on 42 U.S.C. § 3785 , 5 the provision governing appellate review under certain sections of chapter 46, concerning “Justice System Improvements,” in which the PSOBA is codified.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.