42 U.S.C. § 3789d
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 31
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: Canterino v. Wilson, 546 F. Supp. 174 (W.D. Ky. 1982).
Canterino v. Wilson, 546 F. Supp. 174 (W.D. Ky. 1982). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(l). 3. Inmate Wages The absence of an industry and lack of maintenance jobs for females at KCIW deprives female inmates not only of the opportunity to acquire valuable skills and work habits, but also of the highest paying prison jobs.”
United States v. State of North Carolina, 192 F. Supp. 3d 620 (M.D.N.C. 2016). “Inexplicably, however, they delayed bringing this matter to the court’s attention until the grace period had largely passed.”
United States v. City of Philadelphia, 644 F.2d 187 (3rd Cir. 1980). “We also must decide whether the government has stated a claim for relief under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. § 3789d, or the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972 (the “Revenue Sharing Act”), 31 U.”
Daniels v. City of New York, 200 F.R.D. 205 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). “This investigation was brought pursuant to two statutes: the nondiscrimination' provision of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c); and section 14141 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, 42 U.”
Ling v. State, 702 S.E.2d 881 (Ga. 2010). “, and the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 USC § 3789d (c), which prohibit national origin discrimination.”
Woods v. Horton, 167 Cal. App. 4th 658 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008). “” (42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(l).) 6 This pilot program (Pen.”
Thomas J. Donaghy v. City of Omaha, a Mun. Corp., James Skinner, Chief of Police & P.J. Morgan, Mayor of Omaha, 933 F.2d 1448 (8th Cir. 1991). “§ 1242 and 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(3). Specifically, the United States alleged that the City discriminated against blacks: (1) by not recruiting, hiring, assigning, and promoting blacks on the same basis as whites; (2) by using examinations and other qualification standards that…”
Sims v. Montgomery Cnty. Comm'n, 873 F. Supp. 585 (M.D. Ala. 1994). “42 U.S.C.A. § 3789d(c)(4)(A). The defendants contend that the Dodson intervenors have not pleaded or presented any evidence that the defendants received any funds under the Act or that the intervenors exhausted the required *609 administrative remedies.”
Moeller v. Bradford Cnty., 444 F. Supp. 2d 316 (M.D. Penn. 2006). “42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(l) provides: (1) No person in any State shall on the ground of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under or denied employment in connection with any…”
Moore v. City of Ferguson, 213 F. Supp. 3d 1138 (E.D. Mo. 2016). “§ 14141 , the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. § 3789d (“Safe Streets Act”), and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1962, 42 U.”
United States v. City of Yonkers, 592 F. Supp. 570 (S.D.N.Y. 1984). “839 , 882 (repealed 1982); and the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. § 3789d. The United States requested that defendants be ordered to employ nondiscriminatory selection procedures and sought compensation for identifiable victims in the form of jobs,…”
Auleta v. United States Dep't of Just., 80 F. Supp. 3d 198 (D.D.C. 2015). “§ 2000d (“Prohibition against exclusion from participation in, denial of benefits of, and discrimination under Federally assisted programs on ground of race, color, or national origin”); and 42 U.S.C. § 3789d (“Prohibition of Federal control over State and local criminal justice…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(a) — 1 case
United States v. City of Philadelphia, 644 F.2d 187 (3rd Cir. 1980). “We also must decide whether the government has stated a claim for relief under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. § 3789d, or the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972 (the “Revenue Sharing Act”), 31 U.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c) — 6 cases
Daniels v. City of New York, 200 F.R.D. 205 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). “This investigation was brought pursuant to two statutes: the nondiscrimination' provision of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c); and section 14141 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, 42 U.”
Ling v. State, 702 S.E.2d 881 (Ga. 2010). “, and the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 USC § 3789d (c), which prohibit national origin discrimination.”
Myers v. Simpson, 831 F. Supp. 2d 945 (E.D. Va. 2011).
Fong v. City of Newark (D.N.J. 2023).
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(1) — 3 cases
United States v. City of Yonkers, 609 F. Supp. 1281 (S.D.N.Y. 1984).
Curl v. Reavis (W.D.N.C. 2025).
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(2) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(2)(A)(i) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(2)(C) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(2)(E) — 2 cases
United States v. State of North Carolina, 192 F. Supp. 3d 620 (M.D.N.C. 2016). “Inexplicably, however, they delayed bringing this matter to the court’s attention until the grace period had largely passed.”
Daniels v. City of New York, 200 F.R.D. 205 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). “This investigation was brought pursuant to two statutes: the nondiscrimination' provision of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c); and section 14141 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, 42 U.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(2)(G)(ii) — 1 case
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(3) — 2 cases
Thomas J. Donaghy v. City of Omaha, a Mun. Corp., James Skinner, Chief of Police & P.J. Morgan, Mayor of Omaha, 933 F.2d 1448 (8th Cir. 1991). “§ 1242 and 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(3). Specifically, the United States alleged that the City discriminated against blacks: (1) by not recruiting, hiring, assigning, and promoting blacks on the same basis as whites; (2) by using examinations and other qualification standards that…”
United States v. State of North Carolina, 192 F. Supp. 3d 620 (M.D.N.C. 2016). “Inexplicably, however, they delayed bringing this matter to the court’s attention until the grace period had largely passed.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(4)(A) — 2 cases
Sims v. Montgomery Cnty. Comm'n, 873 F. Supp. 585 (M.D. Ala. 1994). “42 U.S.C.A. § 3789d(c)(4)(A). The defendants contend that the Dodson intervenors have not pleaded or presented any evidence that the defendants received any funds under the Act or that the intervenors exhausted the required *609 administrative remedies.”
Atkins v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2015).
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(4)(B) — 1 case
Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Liebowitz, 730 F.2d 905 (2d Cir. 1984).
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(l) — 9 cases
Canterino v. Wilson, 546 F. Supp. 174 (W.D. Ky. 1982). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(l). 3. Inmate Wages The absence of an industry and lack of maintenance jobs for females at KCIW deprives female inmates not only of the opportunity to acquire valuable skills and work habits, but also of the highest paying prison jobs.”
Woods v. Horton, 167 Cal. App. 4th 658 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008). “” (42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(l).) 6 This pilot program (Pen.”
Moeller v. Bradford Cnty., 444 F. Supp. 2d 316 (M.D. Penn. 2006). “42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(l) provides: (1) No person in any State shall on the ground of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under or denied employment in connection with any…”
United States v. City of Philadelphia, 644 F.2d 187 (3rd Cir. 1980). “We also must decide whether the government has stated a claim for relief under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. § 3789d, or the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972 (the “Revenue Sharing Act”), 31 U.”
Sims v. Montgomery Cnty. Comm'n, 873 F. Supp. 585 (M.D. Ala. 1994). “42 U.S.C.A. § 3789d(c)(4)(A). The defendants contend that the Dodson intervenors have not pleaded or presented any evidence that the defendants received any funds under the Act or that the intervenors exhausted the required *609 administrative remedies.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(cX2)(D)(i) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.