42 U.S.C. § 3796b
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2024 · leading case: Calvin Hawkins & Donna L. Hawkins v. United States, 469 F.3d 993 (Fed. Cir. 2006).
Calvin Hawkins & Donna L. Hawkins v. United States, 469 F.3d 993 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “]” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(5) (Supp. II 1984). The Act does not define “line of duty.”
Hillensbeck v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 477 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “13 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(4) (2003)) (defining “firefighter” as “an individual serving as an officially recognized or designated member of a legally organized volunteer fire department and an officially recognized or designated public employee member of a rescue squad or…”
White v. United States, 543 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3796b. [2] By legislation passed shortly after September 11, 2001, the amount of benefits was increased to $250,000 retroactively, effective on January 1, 2001.”
Hawkins v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 74 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(3)(i). Therefore, Plaintiffs, as the spouse and “child” of Ms.”
Julie Amber-Messick, Adm'x of the Est. of Christopher Kangas, Deceased v. United States, 483 F.3d 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2007). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(4) (2000 & Supp. II 2002).”
Messick v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 319 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “In contrast, other definitions in 42 U.S.C. § 3796b consciously do use the word “means” to define the terms “child,” “law enforcement officer,” “member of a rescue squad or ambulance crew,” and “public safety officer.”
Leonard E. Cassella v. United States, 469 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “]” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(5) (emphasis added). The Act, however, does not define “line of duty.”
Groff v. United States, 493 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2007). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(9)(A). The Court of Federal Claims in the Groff case overturned the BJA’s decision denying benefits, while the court in the LaBare case upheld the BJA’s decision denying benefits.”
Groff v. United States, 72 Fed. Cl. 68 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “See 42 U.S.C.A. § 3796b Notes (West 2003). Congress also acted in 2003 to broaden the coverage for public safety officers who die of heart attacks or other occupational illnesses while on duty or shortly thereafter.”
LaBare v. United States, 72 Fed. Cl. 111 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(4); 28 C.F.R. § 32.2 (n).”
Hillensbeck v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 369 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(3)(i). Since the court’s August 31, 2005 Memorandum Opinion and Order in Hillensbeck I, the court has been advised of facts that evidence Plaintiff Shonda Scott Hillensbeck was not a student, as defined in Section 8101 of Title 5, 3 on November 13,1999,…”
Chacon v. United States, 32 Fed. Cl. 684 (Fed. Cl. 1995). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(3); see also 28 C.F.R. § 32.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(2) — 4 cases
Messick v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 319 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “In contrast, other definitions in 42 U.S.C. § 3796b consciously do use the word “means” to define the terms “child,” “law enforcement officer,” “member of a rescue squad or ambulance crew,” and “public safety officer.”
Leslie Womack Real Est., Inc. v. Dunbar (In Re Dunbar), 99 B.R. 320 (Bankr. M.D. La. 1989).
In Re Rigdon, 133 B.R. 460 (Bankr. S.D. Ill. 1991).
Melville v. United States, 231 Ct. Cl. 776 (Ct. Cl. 1982).
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(3) — 6 cases
White v. United States, 543 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3796b. [2] By legislation passed shortly after September 11, 2001, the amount of benefits was increased to $250,000 retroactively, effective on January 1, 2001.”
Marvin A. Chacon, Catherine L. Chacon, Johnny O. Contreras, Sally Contreras, Evelyn Bielak, Ronald Springfield & Carol Springfield v. United States, 48 F.3d 508 (Fed. Cir. 1995).
Patricia Watson v. Sec'y of Labor, 693 F.3d 620 (6th Cir. 2012).
Chacon v. United States, 32 Fed. Cl. 684 (Fed. Cl. 1995). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(3); see also 28 C.F.R. § 32.”
Messick v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 319 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “In contrast, other definitions in 42 U.S.C. § 3796b consciously do use the word “means” to define the terms “child,” “law enforcement officer,” “member of a rescue squad or ambulance crew,” and “public safety officer.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(3)(i) — 2 cases
Hawkins v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 74 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(3)(i). Therefore, Plaintiffs, as the spouse and “child” of Ms.”
Hillensbeck v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 369 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(3)(i). Since the court’s August 31, 2005 Memorandum Opinion and Order in Hillensbeck I, the court has been advised of facts that evidence Plaintiff Shonda Scott Hillensbeck was not a student, as defined in Section 8101 of Title 5, 3 on November 13,1999,…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(3)(ii) — 1 case
Hillensbeck v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 369 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(3)(i). Since the court’s August 31, 2005 Memorandum Opinion and Order in Hillensbeck I, the court has been advised of facts that evidence Plaintiff Shonda Scott Hillensbeck was not a student, as defined in Section 8101 of Title 5, 3 on November 13,1999,…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(4) — 7 cases
Julie Amber-Messick, Adm'x of the Est. of Christopher Kangas, Deceased v. United States, 483 F.3d 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2007). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(4) (2000 & Supp. II 2002).”
Hillensbeck v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 477 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “13 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(4) (2003)) (defining “firefighter” as “an individual serving as an officially recognized or designated member of a legally organized volunteer fire department and an officially recognized or designated public employee member of a rescue squad or…”
Messick v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 319 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “In contrast, other definitions in 42 U.S.C. § 3796b consciously do use the word “means” to define the terms “child,” “law enforcement officer,” “member of a rescue squad or ambulance crew,” and “public safety officer.”
Hillensbeck v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 62 (Fed. Cl. 2005).
Hillensbeck v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 369 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(3)(i). Since the court’s August 31, 2005 Memorandum Opinion and Order in Hillensbeck I, the court has been advised of facts that evidence Plaintiff Shonda Scott Hillensbeck was not a student, as defined in Section 8101 of Title 5, 3 on November 13,1999,…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(4)(2003) — 1 case
Hillensbeck v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 477 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “13 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(4) (2003)) (defining “firefighter” as “an individual serving as an officially recognized or designated member of a legally organized volunteer fire department and an officially recognized or designated public employee member of a rescue squad or…”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(5) — 5 cases
Calvin Hawkins & Donna L. Hawkins v. United States, 469 F.3d 993 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “]” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(5) (Supp. II 1984). The Act does not define “line of duty.”
Leonard E. Cassella v. United States, 469 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “]” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(5) (emphasis added). The Act, however, does not define “line of duty.”
Maria Demutiis & Nicolas Demutiis v. United States, 291 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
Hawkins v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2006).
Cassella v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2006).
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(6) — 5 cases
Hawkins v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 74 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(3)(i). Therefore, Plaintiffs, as the spouse and “child” of Ms.”
Marlon Bramwell v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 348 F.3d 804 (9th Cir. 2003).
Cassella v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 189 (Fed. Cl. 2005).
Leonard E. Cassella v. United States, 469 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “]” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(5) (emphasis added). The Act, however, does not define “line of duty.”
Cassella v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2006).
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(7) — 10 cases
Calvin Hawkins & Donna L. Hawkins v. United States, 469 F.3d 993 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “]” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(5) (Supp. II 1984). The Act does not define “line of duty.”
United States v. Dale Lynn Ryan, 9 F.3d 660 (8th Cir. 1994).
Chacon v. United States, 32 Fed. Cl. 684 (Fed. Cl. 1995). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(3); see also 28 C.F.R. § 32.”
Hillensbeck v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 477 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “13 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(4) (2003)) (defining “firefighter” as “an individual serving as an officially recognized or designated member of a legally organized volunteer fire department and an officially recognized or designated public employee member of a rescue squad or…”
Smykowski v. United States, 227 Ct. Cl. 284 (Ct. Cl. 1981).
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(7)(A) — 2 cases
Leonard E. Cassella v. United States, 469 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “]” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(5) (emphasis added). The Act, however, does not define “line of duty.”
Cassella v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2006).
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(8) — 11 cases
Julie Amber-Messick, Adm'x of the Est. of Christopher Kangas, Deceased v. United States, 483 F.3d 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2007). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(4) (2000 & Supp. II 2002).”
Hawkins v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 74 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(3)(i). Therefore, Plaintiffs, as the spouse and “child” of Ms.”
Messick v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 319 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “In contrast, other definitions in 42 U.S.C. § 3796b consciously do use the word “means” to define the terms “child,” “law enforcement officer,” “member of a rescue squad or ambulance crew,” and “public safety officer.”
Groff v. United States, 72 Fed. Cl. 68 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “See 42 U.S.C.A. § 3796b Notes (West 2003). Congress also acted in 2003 to broaden the coverage for public safety officers who die of heart attacks or other occupational illnesses while on duty or shortly thereafter.”
Leonard E. Cassella v. United States, 469 F.3d 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “]” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(5) (emphasis added). The Act, however, does not define “line of duty.”
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(8)(A) — 8 cases
Hillensbeck v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 477 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “13 (citing 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(4) (2003)) (defining “firefighter” as “an individual serving as an officially recognized or designated member of a legally organized volunteer fire department and an officially recognized or designated public employee member of a rescue squad or…”
Hawkins v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 74 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(3)(i). Therefore, Plaintiffs, as the spouse and “child” of Ms.”
Hillensbeck v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 369 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(3)(i). Since the court’s August 31, 2005 Memorandum Opinion and Order in Hillensbeck I, the court has been advised of facts that evidence Plaintiff Shonda Scott Hillensbeck was not a student, as defined in Section 8101 of Title 5, 3 on November 13,1999,…”
LaBare v. United States, 72 Fed. Cl. 111 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(4); 28 C.F.R. § 32.2 (n).”
Hillensbeck v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 62 (Fed. Cl. 2005).
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(9) — 2 cases
Messick v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 319 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “In contrast, other definitions in 42 U.S.C. § 3796b consciously do use the word “means” to define the terms “child,” “law enforcement officer,” “member of a rescue squad or ambulance crew,” and “public safety officer.”
Moore v. Dep't of Just., 760 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
— 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(9)(A) — 4 cases
Groff v. United States, 493 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2007). “See 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(9)(A). The Court of Federal Claims in the Groff case overturned the BJA’s decision denying benefits, while the court in the LaBare case upheld the BJA’s decision denying benefits.”
Groff v. United States, 72 Fed. Cl. 68 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “See 42 U.S.C.A. § 3796b Notes (West 2003). Congress also acted in 2003 to broaden the coverage for public safety officers who die of heart attacks or other occupational illnesses while on duty or shortly thereafter.”
LaBare v. United States, 72 Fed. Cl. 111 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “” 42 U.S.C. § 3796b(4); 28 C.F.R. § 32.2 (n).”
Moore v. Dep't of Just., 760 F.3d 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.