42 U.S.C. § 4002
Additional Congressional findings and declaration of purpose
This Act, referred to in subsec. (b), means Pub. L. 93–234,
Section was enacted as part of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, and not as part of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 which comprises this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2021 · leading case: National Wildlife Federation & Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. Federal Emergency Management Agency
National Wildlife Federation & Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2004)
“” 42 U.S.C. § 4002 (a)(2). The Final Environmental Impact Statement (“FEIS”) for FEMA’s NFIA regulations states that “[i]f a community chooses not to participate in the [NFIP], economic development in the flood hazard area may be severely restricted.”
Henry A. Bagelmann, Jr. And Mary Jo Bagelmann v. First National Bank and Iowa Bankers Mortgage Corporation (2012)
“42 U.S.C. § 4002 (2006). The NFIA basically put the federal government in the flood insurance business.”
Jacobson v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance (2012)
“2006); see also 42 U.S.C. §§ 4002 (b)(3), 4012(c), 4022; 44 C.”
Florida Key Deer v. Stickney (1994)
“42 U.S.C. § 4002 (b)(3) (1982). The NFIP allows FEMA to make federal flood insurance available only in those areas where the appropriate public body of the community has adopted adequate land use regulations for its flood-prone areas.”
Zumbrun v. United Services Automobile Ass'n (1989)
“The policy at issue was executed and delivered under the so-called “Write Your Own” (“WYO”) program pursuant to the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. § 4002 , and its governing regulations, 44 C.”
Texas Landowners Rights Ass'n v. Harris (1978)
“Finding a strong public policy favoring participation in a flood insurance plan of national scope, 42 U.S.C. § 4002 (a)(5), in December 1973, Congress passed the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973.”
San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Carlsbad (1998)
“( 42 U.S.C. § 4002 (b)(3).) In 1988, City adopted its floodplain management regulations (floodplain ordinance), designed to conserve natural resources, prevent flooding, and prevent and control beach and shore erosion.”
West v. Harris (1978)
“42 U.S.C.A. § 4002 (a)(5), (6). The damages recoverable are pecuniary in nature, not personal, and the amount is based upon the readily ascertainable value of services and property.”
Mason v. Witt (1999)
“” See 42 U.S.C. § 4002 (a)(6). Congress also expressly stated that the NFIP is to be flexible so that “.”
Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development (2008)
“Furthermore, Congress recognized the extent and special circumstances of federal involvement in floodplain management and codified this in 42 U.S.C.A. § 4002 (a)(2) which states: The Congress finds that — the availability of Federal loans, grants, guaranties, insurance, and…”
City of Alexandria v. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2011)
“, citing 42 U.S.C. § 4002 . The National Flood Insurance Program (“NFIP”), which was created by the NFIA, makes flood insurance available to the owners and lessees of land located in participating communities.”
Kmart Corp. v. Kroger Co. (2013)
“]” 42 U.S.C. § 4002 (b)(3) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.