U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 85— AIR POLLUTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES › Part Part A— Air Quality and Emission Limitations

42 U.S.C. § 403

RADON GAS AND INDOOR AIR QUALITY RESEARCH PROGRAM.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)Design of Program.—The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall establish a research program with respect to radon gas and indoor air quality. Such program shall be designed to—“(1) gather data and information on all aspects of indoor air quality in order to contribute to the understanding of health problems associated with the existence of air pollutants in the indoor environment;“(2) coordinate Federal, State, local, and private research and development efforts relating to the improvement of indoor air quality; and“(3) assess appropriate Federal Government actions to mitigate the environmental and health risks associated with indoor air quality problems.“(b)Program Requirements.—The research program required under this section shall include—“(1) research and development concerning the identification, characterization, and monitoring of the sources and levels of indoor air pollution, including radon, which includes research and development relating to—“(A) the measurement of various pollutant concentrations and their strengths and sources,“(B) high-risk building types, and“(C) instruments for indoor air quality data collection;“(2) research relating to the effects of indoor air pollution and radon on human health;“(3) research and development relating to control technologies or other mitigation measures to prevent or abate indoor air pollution (including the development, evaluation, and testing of individual and generic control devices and systems);“(4) demonstration of methods for reducing or eliminating indoor air pollution and radon, including sealing, venting, and other methods that the Administrator determines may be effective;“(5) research, to be carried out in conjunction with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, for the purpose of developing—“(A) methods for assessing the potential for radon contamination of new construction, including (but not limited to) consideration of the moisture content of soil, porosity of soil, and radon content of soil; and“(B) design measures to avoid indoor air pollution; and“(6) the dissemination of information to assure the public availability of the findings of the activities under this section.“(c)Advisory Committees.—The Administrator shall establish a committee comprised of individuals representing Federal agencies concerned with various aspects of indoor air quality and an advisory group comprised of individuals representing the States, the scientific community, industry, and public interest organizations to assist him in carrying out the research program for radon gas and indoor air quality.“(d)Implementation Plan.—Not later than 90 days after the enactment of this Act [Oct. 17, 1986], the Administrator shall submit to the Congress a plan for implementation of the research program under this section. Such plan shall also be submitted to the EPA Science Advisory Board, which shall, within a reasonable period of time, submit its comments on such plan to Congress.“(e)Report.—Not later than 2 years after the enactment of this Act [Oct. 17, 1986], the Administrator shall submit to Congress a report respecting his activities under this section and making such recommendations as appropriate.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 224 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1942–2025 · leading case: Ted Martin v. Louis W. Sullivan, Sec'y of the Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 894 F.2d 1520 (11th Cir. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ted Martin v. Louis W. Sullivan, Sec'y of the Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 894 F.2d 1520 (11th Cir. 1990). · cites it 5× “42 U.S.C. § 403 (b) (Supp. II 1984). The Act provides that deductions, based on a qualified individual’s wages or self-employment income, shall be made from any payment to which an individual is entitled until the *1531 total of the deductions equals the individual’s benefit for…”
L.N.P. v. Kilolo Kijakazi, 64 F.4th 577 (4th Cir. 2023). · cites it 4× “In his complaint, he challenged SSA’s method for calculating auxiliary benefits for dependent children, alleging that it violated a provision of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 403 , and an implementing regulation, 20 C.”
Hamilton v. Lanning, 560 U.S. 505 (2010). · cites it 2× “§8415 (a) (“multiplied by such individual’s total service”); 42 U. S. C. §403 (f)(3) (“multi­ plied by the number of months in such year”).”
Leonard ALBALOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis S. SULLIVAN, M.D., Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., Defendant-Appellee, 907 F.2d 871 (9th Cir. 1990). · cites it 4× “42 U.S.C. § 403 (b). If these earnings create an overpayment of benefits, the Secretary is to make deductions from monthly benefits.”
Weinberger v. Salfi, 422 U.S. 749 (1975). · cites it 2× “[12] Judge Wyzanski wrote concerning the effect of the last sentence of § 405 (h): "In the present action, while plaintiff does, perhaps *798 improperly, seek damages, his complaint also has prayers for a declaratory judgment that § 203 (f) (3) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.…”
Alberta E. Burns, on Behalf of Herself & All Others Similarly Situated v. United States R.R. Ret. Bd., 701 F.2d 193 (D.C. Cir. 1983). · cites it 9× “42 U.S.C. § 403 (b). The RRA incorporates the SSA excess earnings provision by reference.”
Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603 (1960). · cites it 2× “§ 203 (b), (e), 42 U. S. C. § 403 (b), (e). Of special importance in this case is the fact that eligibility for benefits, and the amount of such benefits, do not in any true sense depend on contribution to the program through the payment of taxes, but rather on the earnings…”
Schafer v. Astrue, 641 F.3d 49 (4th Cir. 2011). · cites it 4× “See 42 U.S.C. § 403 (a)(1). As a result, where an additional child claims benefits from a record, children already claiming from it could see a reduction in their benefits.”
Frederick W. WHITESIDE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sec'y OF HEALTH & HUMAN Servs., Defendant-Appellant, 834 F.2d 1289 (6th Cir. 1987). · cites it 4× “435 (1987), in order to determine whether the retiree’s benefits are subject to “deductions on account of work” under 42 U.S.C. § 403 (b) and (f). We conclude that the Secretary correctly construed the statute as not permitting the deduction of self-employment losses from…”
Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld, 420 U.S. 636 (1975). · cites it 2× “42 U. S. C. §§ 403 (b) and (f). [7] Appellee filed this suit in February 1973, [8] claiming jurisdiction under 28 U.”
Rollie M. Holden v. Joseph A. Califano, Sec'y of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 641 F.2d 405 (6th Cir. 1981). · cites it 5× “Holden was not eligible for benefits because he was rendering “substantial services” to a trade or business, contrary to 42 U.S.C. § 403 (f). The SSA’s determination was endorsed by an administrative law judge.”
Davis Ex Rel. Swilley v. Richardson, 342 F. Supp. 588 (D. Conn. 1972). · cites it 5× “Norma Davis, an eight-year-old child, has been denied payments based on her deceased father’s earning record because, under 42 U.S.C. § 403 (a), as an illegitimate child entitled to benefits under 42 U.”
Show all 224 citing cases →
— 42 U.S.C. § 403(a) — 1 case
Griffin v. Richardson, 346 F. Supp. 1226 (D. Maryland 1972).
— 42 U.S.C. § 403(b) — 3 cases
Minton v. Celebrezze, 318 F.2d 429 (7th Cir. 1963).
Ford v. Ribicoff, 199 F. Supp. 822 (E.D. Tenn. 1961).
Watson v. Chater, Comm'r (4th Cir. 1997).
— 42 U.S.C. § 403(d) — 1 case
Rhodes v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 79 F. Supp. 498 (E.D. Pa. 1947).
— 42 U.S.C. § 403(f) — 1 case
Kore v. Celebrezze, 342 F.2d 638 (7th Cir. 1965).
— 42 U.S.C. § 403(f)(3) — 1 case
Runey v. Richardson, 357 F. Supp. 482 (D.S.C. 1972).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.