Whenever real property is acquired by a State agency and furnished as a required contribution incident to a Federal program or project, the Federal agency having authority over the program or project may not accept such property unless such State agency has made all payments and provided all assistance and assurances, as are required of a State agency by sections 4630 and 4655 of this title. Such State agency shall pay the cost of such requirements in the same manner and to the same extent as the real property acquired for such project, except that in the case of any real property acquisition or displacement occurring prior to July 1, 1972, such Federal agency shall pay 100 per centum of the first $25,000 of the cost of providing such payments and assistance.
Notes of Decisions
Dep't of Transp. & Dev. of Louisiana v. Beaird-Poulan, Inc, 449 U.S. 971 (1981).
“The only substantive provisions of the Act dealing with state condemnations in general are carefully treated in 42 U. S. C. §§ 4627 and 4630, which forbid the head of a "Federal agency” to approve a "grant to, or contract or agreement with, a State agency, under which Federal…”
City of Indianapolis, Etc. v. Cent. R. Co., 369 N.E.2d 1109 (Ind. Ct. App. 1977).
“42 U.S.C. §§ 4627 , 4628 & 4630. *1116 The Act, [11] the Indiana Act that is, closely follows many of the provisions in the Federal Act, and is obviously this state's response to a federal mandate.”
Moorer v. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 417 F. Supp. 1261 (W.D. Mo. 1976).
“[ 42 U.S.C. § 4627 ] Whenever real property is acquired by a State agency at the request of a Federal agency for a Federal program or project, such acquisition shall, for the purposes of this chapter, be deemed an acquisition by the Federal agency having authority over such…”
City of Indianapolis v. Cent. R.R., 369 N.E.2d 1109 (Ind. Ct. App. 1977).
“42 U.S.C. §§ 4627 , 4628 & 4630. The Act, 11 the Indiana Act that is, closely follows many of the provisions in the Federal Act, and is obviously this state’s response to a federal mandate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.