U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 61— UNIFORM RELOCATION ASSISTANCE AND REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION POLICIES FOR FEDERAL AND FEDERALLY ASSISTED PROGRAMS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— UNIFORM RELOCATION ASSISTANCE

42 U.S.C. § 4630

Requirements for relocation payments and assistance of federally assisted program; assurances of availability of housing

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
Notwithstanding any other law, the head of a Federal agency shall not approve any grant to, or contract or agreement with, a displacing agency (other than a Federal agency), under which Federal financial assistance will be available to pay all or part of the cost of any program or project which will result in the displacement of any person on or after January 2, 1971, unless he receives satisfactory assurances from such displacing agency that—(1) fair and reasonable relocation payments and assistance shall be provided to or for displaced persons, as are required to be provided by a Federal agency under sections 4622, 4623, and 4624 of this title;(2) relocation assistance programs offering the services described in section 4625 of this title shall be provided to such displaced persons;(3) within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement, comparable replacement dwellings will be available to displaced persons in accordance with section 4625(c)(3) of this title.(Pub. L. 91–646, title II, § 210, Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1899; Pub. L. 100–17, title IV, § 410, Apr. 2, 1987, 101 Stat. 254.)Editorial NotesAmendments

1987—Pub. L. 100–17 in introductory provisions substituted “displacing agency (other than a Federal agency)” for “State agency” and “assurances from such displacing agency” for “assurances from such State agency”, and in par. (3) substituted “comparable replacement dwellings” for “decent, safe, and sanitary replacement dwellings”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1987 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–17 effective on effective date provided in regulations promulgated under section 4633 of this title (as amended by section 412 of Pub. L. 100–17), but not later than 2 years after Apr. 2, 1987, see section 418 of Pub. L. 100–17, set out as a note under section 4601 of this title.

Effective Date

Section as completely applicable to all States after July 1, 1972, but until such date applicable to a State to extent the State is able under its laws to comply with this section, see section 221(b) of Pub. L. 91–646, set out as a note under section 4601 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1972–2024 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Dep't of Transp. v. Little, 2004 OK 74 (Okla. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Dep't of Transp. v. Little, 2004 OK 74 (Okla. 2004). · cites it 2× “See the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 4630 and § 4655. The provisions of 42 U.”
Starke v. Sec'y, United States Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 454 F. Supp. 477 (W.D. Okla. 1977). · cites it 6× “Plaintiff alleges that Defendants did not comply with 42 U.S.C. § 4630 in making the decision. 42 U.”
Beaty v. Imperial Irrigation Dist., 186 Cal. App. 3d 897 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “( 42 U.S.C. § 4630 ; Relocation Assistance In California: Legislative Response To The Federal Program (1972) 3 Pacific L.”
Norfolk Redevelopment & Hous. Auth. v. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. of Virginia, 464 U.S. 30 (1983). “42 U. S. C. § 4630 . In order to qualify for federal funds, therefore, many States, such as Virginia, see Va.”
Dr. & Mrs. Robert A. Katsev v. William T. Coleman, Jr., 530 F.2d 176 (8th Cir. 1976). · cites it 2× “n appeal they argue (1) that the federal defendants’ failures to file the EIS before obtaining corridor approval for the southern segment in February, 1970, and to discuss an alternative highway alignment in the EIS, constituted violations of NEPA, and (2) that the relocation…”
Keith v. Volpe, 352 F. Supp. 1324 (C.D. Cal. 1972). · cites it 2× “See Section 210, 42 U.S.C. § 4630 . In enacting Chapter V of the Highway Act and later in replacing it with the more comprehensive Relocation Act, Congress intended to establish relocation policies that would, in the words of Section 501 of the Highway Act, 23 U.”
Joyce Goolsby, Individually & on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. W. Michael Blumenthal, as Sec'y of the Dep't of the Treasury, 581 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1978). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C.A. § 4630 ; cf. 24 C.F.R. § 42.20 (s), § 42.”
Boylston Dev. Grp., Inc. v. 22 Boylston Street Corp., 591 N.E.2d 157 (Mass. 1992). “That section of the statute merely prohibits the head of any Federal agency from authorizing expenditures on redevelopment programs that do not make proper provision for relocation benefits.”
Moorer v. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 417 F. Supp. 1261 (W.D. Mo. 1976). · cites it 3× “42 U.S.C. § 4630 . 20 HUD first argues that the definition of “displaced person” includes only individuals displaced as a result of a federal acquisition of real property or a federally-financed state acquisition.”
Dick Jones v. Dist. of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency (Three Cases), 499 F.2d 502 (D.C. Cir. 1974). “42 U.S.C. § 4630 . 12 . 42 U.S.C. §'4625.”
Keith v. Volpe, 858 F.2d 467 (9th Cir. 1988). “42 U.S.C. § 4630 (1983). In addition to these claims, plaintiffs claimed that state defendants violated section 128(a) of the Federaí-Aid Highway Act, 23 U.”
Grand Boulevard Improvement Ass'n v. City of Chicago, 553 F. Supp. 1154 (N.D. Ill. 1982). “(1976), and the Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 4630 (1976). On each of those issues summary judgment was awarded to the government.”
Show all 39 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.