U.S. Code » Title 42 » CHAPTER 7— SOCIAL SECURITY › SUBCHAPTER III— GRANTS TO STATES FOR UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION

42 U.S.C. § 501

Use of available funds

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

The amounts made available pursuant to section 1101(c)(1)(A) of this title for the purpose of assisting the States in the administration of their unemployment compensation laws shall be used as hereinafter provided.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 55 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1937–2025 · leading case: California v. Grace Brethren Church, 457 U.S. 393 (1982).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
California v. Grace Brethren Church, 457 U.S. 393 (1982). · cites it 2× “§ 49d(b); 42 U. S. C. § 501 . [6] See Employment Security Amendments of 1970, Pub.”
Livadas v. Bradshaw, 512 U.S. 107 (1994). “IV); 42 U. S. C. §501 et seq.; 42 U. S. C. § 1101 et seq.”
Ohio Bureau of Emp. Servs. v. Hodory, 431 U.S. 471 (1977). “*482 Ill Pre-emption Appellee argues that the Ohio statute is in conflict with, or pre-empted by, certain provisions of the Social Security Act, 42 U. S. C. § 501 et seq., and the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, 26 U.”
New York Tel. Co. v. New York State Dep't of Labor, 440 U.S. 519 (1979). “, 42 U. S. C. § 501 et seq., § 1101 et seq.”
Anna Ross v. John Horn, 598 F.2d 1312 (3d Cir. 1979). “THE CHALLENGED PROCEDURES The following background to these proceedings was succinctly set forth by the court below: New Jersey participates in the jointly-funded federal-state unemployment compensation program established by Title III of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 501…”
Beeland Wholesale Co. v. Kaufman, 174 So. 516 (Ala. 1937). · cites it 2× “In this connection we observe that title III of the Act ( 42 U.S.C.A. § 501 et seq.) makes an appropriation out of which the Social Security Board, created by the act, will certify for payment to each state for the administration of its unemployment compensation law an amount to…”
Commonwealth v. Morris, 575 A.2d 582 (Pa. 1990). · cites it 2× “§ 421 , Disability determinations. This is the title that contains the allegedly preemptive statute in question, § 408.”
Klimko v. Virginia Emp. Comm'n, 222 S.E.2d 559 (Va. 1976). “42 U.S.C. §§ 501 , et seq. Under Code § 60.”
Torres v. New York State Dep't of Labor, 321 F. Supp. 432 (S.D.N.Y. 1971). · cites it 2× “HAYS, Circuit Judge: The complaint in this action alleges the deprivation of rights secured to the plaintiffs by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and by parts of the Social Security Act of 1935, 42 U.S.C. § 501 et seq. (1964). Plaintiffs seek a…”
Acosta v. Brown, 213 Cal. App. 4th 234 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013). “BACKGROUND The California Unemployment Insurance Program The California unemployment insurance program is part of a national program established under the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. § 501 et seq.), the Federal Unemployment Tax Act ( 26 U.”
Macias v. New Mexico Dep't of Labor, 300 F.R.D. 529 (D.N.M. 2014). “The Court has already concluded that the Order did not incorporate the Agreement, so the Court’s rule 60(b)(5) analysis must be careful not to equate enforcement of the Agreement—which unquestionably binds NMDOL—with enforcement of the Order—which merely restates the parties’…”
Bonita Paschal v. Sally Jackson, 936 F.2d 940 (7th Cir. 1991). “42 U.S.C. §§ 501 , 502 and 1101(c)(l)(A)(i).”
Show all 55 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.