42 U.S.C. § 523

TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)Calculation of Limit on Project-Based Assistance.—

[Amended this section.]

“(b)Partial Payment of Claims on Multifamily Housing Projects.—

[Amended section 1735f–19 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.]

“(c)Reuse and Rescission of Certain Recaptured Budget Authority.—

[Amended this section.]

“(d)Section 8 Contract Renewals.—

[Amended section 405(a) of Pub. L. 104–99, set out below.]

“(e)Renewal Upon Request of Owner.—

[Amended section 211 of Pub. L. 104–204, set out below.]

“(f)Extension of Demonstration Contract Period.—

[Amended section 212 of Pub. L. 104–204, set out below.]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2009–2019 · leading case: Vasquez v. Astrue, 572 F.3d 586 (9th Cir. 2009).
Vasquez v. Astrue, 572 F.3d 586 (9th Cir. 2009). · cites it 4× “42 U.S.C. § 523 (d)(5)(A) ("An individual's statement as to pain or other symptoms shall not alone be conclusive evidence of disability as defined in this section; there must be medical signs and findings .”
Vasquez v. Astrue (9th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “42 U.S.C. § 523 (d)(5)(A) (“An individual’s statement as to pain or other symp- toms shall not alone be conclusive evidence of dis- ability as defined in this section; there must be medical signs and findings .”
SBCR, Inc. d/b/a S. Concrete Repair, BITCO Ins. Companies v. Calvin Doss, 275 So. 3d 1290 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019). “However, the E/C argue, and Claimant does not dispute, that disability benefits were denied because Claimant did not work at least 20 quarters during the ten year period as required by 42 U.S.C. § 523 (c)(1)(B)(i). The JCC’s finding of ineligibility was based solely on…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.