42 U.S.C. § 5603
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1988–2013 · leading case: In the Interest of Doe
In the Interest of Doe (1999)
“] 42 U.S.C. § 5603 (16) (emphases added). In short, the JJDPA requires that 1) the minor be brought before a court with proper jurisdiction; 2) the minor receive “due process”; and 3) a written report be submitted to the court before issuance of the court order.”
Grenier Ex Rel. Grenier v. Kennebec County (1990)
“that such juveniles, if placed in facilities, are placed in facilities which (i) are the least restrictive alternatives appropriate to the needs of the child and the community; (ii) are in reasonable proximity to the family and the home communities of such juveniles; and (iii)…”
State in Interest of TDC (1988)
“It would be entirely inappropriate for this Court to presume that when Congress referred to "juvenile acts which, if committed by an adult, would be deemed a crime” that it really only meant “serious criminal conduct” as defined by the Federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquent…”
Zimmerman v. Cambridge Credit Counseling Corp. (2005)
“§ 3102 (a)(3) (stating that “ ‘nonprofit organization’ means an organization determined by the Secretary of the Treasury to be an organization described in section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986”); 16 U.S.”
Flores (Adrian) v. State (2013)
“§ 5633 (a)(13), and subject to "graduated sanctions" that include rehabilitative programs, 42 U.S.C. § 5603 (24). We conclude this contention lacks merit because the cited provisions of the JJDPA do not apply to juveniles who have been certified to stand trial as adults.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.