42 U.S.C. § 5633
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32
cases, 1978–2013 · leading case: In re Shelby R.
In re Shelby R. (2013)
“1 effectively takes its meaning from section 5633(a)(11)(A)(ii) of the federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act ( 42 U.S.C. § 5633 (a)(11)(A)(ii) (2006)). This section of the federal act sets forth one of four core requirements with which a state must comply in…”
Doe v. McFaul (1984)
““Count 2 states that confinement of juveniles at the Corrections Center violated the JJDPA, 42 U.S.C. § 5633 (12), and Ohio Rev.Code § 2151.”
In re Shelby R. (2013)
“1 effectively takes its meaning from section 5633(a)(11)(A)(ii) of the federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act ( 42 U.S.C. § 5633 (a)(11)(A)(ii) (2006)). This section of the federal act sets forth one of four core requirements with which a state must comply in…”
Taylor v. Robinson (1998)
“" (emphasis added)); 42 U.S.C. § 5633 (12) through (14) (1994) (conditioning states' eligibility for certain federal funding on states' agreement not to confine juveniles "in any jail or lock-up for adults").”
People v. Juvenile Court, City & County of Denver (1995)
“B The juvenile court concluded that the detention in secured facilities of a juvenile for committing a status offense is prohibited by section 223 of the Juvenile Act, 42 U.S.C. § 5633 (a)(12)(A) (1993 Supp.).”
In re: Shelby R. (2012)
“¶ 45 Further, the State cites the federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 (Delinquency Act) ( 42 U.S.C. § 5633 (a)(11)(A)(ii) (2006)) for the proposition the valid court order exception permits incarceration for unlawful consumption.”
State Ex Rel. L.E.A. v. Hammergren (1980)
“" 42 U.S.C. § 5633 (a)(12) (1976). Minnesota, in adopting the federal policy of deinstitutionalization of status offenders, is moving in the direction adopted by the ABA Juvenile Justice Standards Project, Standards Relating to Noncriminal Misbehavior.”
Troutt Bros., Inc. v. Emison (1992)
“42 U.S.C. § 5633 (1988). If the states do not comply with the federal program they will not receive grant money.”
In re G. B. (1981)
“This legislative mandate is largely in keeping with the Federal Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, section 223 ( 42 U.S.C. §5633 (12) (1974)), as it existed until 1980, which provides funding to States for juvenile crime prevention.”
De Wit v. Firstar Corp. (1995)
“2d 710 (1983), established that juvenile court judges were not indispensable parties claims under the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, 42 U.S.C. § 5633 ); Pinson v. Depco, Inc.”
Hendrickson v. Griggs (1988)
“42 U.S.C. § 5633 (a). These requirements include several provisions relating to the detention and jailing of juveniles.”
Commonwealth v. Florence F. (1999)
“This is consistent with the Federal statute, 42 U.S.C. § 5633 (a)(12)(A) (1998), which reads: “juveniles who are charged with or who have committed offenses that would not be criminal if committed by an adult or offenses (other than an offense that constitutes a violation of a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.