42 U.S.C. § 6
TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANCE.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1945–2025 · leading case: Greidinger v. Almand, 30 F. Supp. 3d 413 (D. Maryland 2014).
Greidinger v. Almand, 30 F. Supp. 3d 413 (D. Maryland 2014). “” In furtherance of restrictions to professional licenses, 42 U.S.C. § 6 ,66(a)(16) created procedures under which the “State has (and uses in appropriate cases) authority to withhold or suspend .”
Twin City Barge & Towing Corp. v. Schlesinger, 603 F.2d 197 (Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. 1979). “All of the gas would have continued to be flared, polluting the air and directly contravening the very name and purpose of the Energy Conservation and Production Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6 $01 et seq., which was designed to increase domestic production and refining capacity and conserve…”
Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Premeaux, 187 S.W.2d 690 (Tex. App. 1945). “…the Act of July 1, 1944, 42 U.S.C.A. § 201 , et seq., § 249, by the Public Health and Marine Hospital-Service Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 , 6; 24 U.S. C.A. §§ 1, 11, 26, et seq., which was charged with providing “care of sick and disabled seamen and all other duties formerly…”
Horton v. Molina (N.D. Cal. 2020). “To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 6 1983, a plaintiff must allege two elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or 7 laws of the United States was violated, and (2) that the violation was committed by a 8 person acting under the color of state law.”
Munene v. Noem (D. Ariz. 2025). “because he has opposed any practice made an unlawful employment practice by this 4 subchapter, or because he has made a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any 5 manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this subchapter.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.