42 U.S.C. § 617
Limitation on Federal authority
No officer or employee of the Federal Government may regulate the conduct of States under this part or enforce any provision of this part, except to the extent expressly provided in this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2000–2012 · leading case: Hodges v. COM., DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Hodges v. COM., DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES (2005)
“42 U.S.C. § 617 . Because the Commonwealth is required by the federal government to collect debt created by TANF/support payments and foster care maintenance payments, the General Assembly enacted statutes to meet those federal requirements.”
Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare v. Sebelius (2012)
“As evidence of this purpose, DPW cites 42 U.S.C. § 617 , which provides: No officer or employee of the Federal Government may regulate the conduct of States under this part or enforce any provision of this part, except to the extent expressly provided in this part.”
United States v. City of New York (2004)
“” 42 U.S.C. § 617 . *88 New York has implemented PRWORA through Chapter 55 of the Social Services Law.”
California Alliance of Child & Family Services v. Allenby (2006)
“42 U.S.C. §§ 617 (a)(2), 672(b)(2). Section 675(4)(A) of the Act enumerates the costs to be included in foster care maintenance payments: the cost of (and the cost of providing) food, clothing, shelter, daily supervision, school supplies, a child’s personal incidentals,…”
Arizona v. Shalala (2000)
“” 42 U.S.C. § 617 . This argument, however, must also fail.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.