42 U.S.C. § 6298
Rules
The Commission and the Secretary may each issue such rules as each deems necessary to carry out the provisions of this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1993–1999 · leading case: United States v. Richard Heuer, United States of Am. v. Eugene Holderness, 4 F.3d 723 (9th Cir. 1993).
United States v. Richard Heuer, United States of Am. v. Eugene Holderness, 4 F.3d 723 (9th Cir. 1993). “Count Two concerns storage of hazardous waste, and charges that between April 27, 1988 and November 4, 1988, Holderness knowingly stored propellants and other explosive waste at the Storey facility without a storage permit or interim status authorization in violation of 42 U.”
United States v. Jorge Alberto Merino, 190 F.3d 956 (9th Cir. 1999). “If a mid-five figure cleanup were “substantial” for purposes of the adjustment, it is hard to imagine a storage *959 violation that would not require the adjustment, yet that cannot be right, because the base offense level is supposed to be 8, not 12.”
United States v. Wolfgang Wagner & Photo-Cut, Inc., 29 F.3d 264 (7th Cir. 1994). “42 U.S.C. § 6298 (d)(2)(A). After a bench trial, Wagner and Photo-cut were convicted on both counts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.