42 U.S.C. § 651
Authorization of appropriations
For the purpose of enforcing the support obligations owed by noncustodial parents to their children and the spouse (or former spouse) with whom such children are living, locating noncustodial parents, establishing paternity, obtaining child and spousal support, and assuring that assistance in obtaining support will be available under this part to all children (whether or not eligible for assistance under a State program funded under part A) for whom such assistance is requested, there is hereby authorized to be appropriated for each fiscal year a sum sufficient to carry out the purposes of this part.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 382
cases (51 in the last 5 years), 1976–2026 · leading case: Blessing v. Freestone, 520 U.S. 329 (1997).
Blessing v. Freestone, 520 U.S. 329 (1997). “2351 , and as amended, 42 U. S. C. §§ 651 -669b (1994 ed. and Supp.”
Cuvillier v. Taylor, 503 F.3d 397 (5th Cir. 2007). “§ 1983 , asserting a deprivation of rights secured by Title IV-D of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 651 -669b. Because we conclude that the provisions Cuvillier relies on do not give rise to individual rights, we' affirm the district court’s dismissal of .”
Sullivan v. Stroop, 496 U.S. 478 (1990). “" 42 U. S. C. § 651 (1982 ed., Supp. V) (emphasis added).”
In Re Marriage of Lappe, 680 N.E.2d 380 (Ill. 1997). “42 U.S.C. § 651 et seq. (Supp.1975). Title IV-D established a Child Support Enforcement Program, "[f]or the purpose of enforcing the support obligations owed by absent parents to their children.”
Salas v. Cortez, 593 P.2d 226 (Cal. 1979). “( 42 U.S.C. § 651 et seq.) Those amendments appropriated federal funds "[f]or the purpose of enforcing the support obligations owed by absent parents to their children, locating absent parents, establishing paternity, and obtaining child support.”
IN RE the Parental Responsibilities Concerning A.C.B., a Child, & Concerning Laura Jeane Frederick, & Joshua Broyhill, & Concerning Pueblo Cnty. Child Support Servs., Intervenor-Appellee., 507 P.3d 1078 (Colo. Ct. App. 2022). “2021; see also 42 U.S.C. § 651 . 2 We offer no opinion as to whether the sanction CSS sought is a proper remedial contempt sanction, as Broyhill didn't challenge the propriety of the requested sanction on appeal.”
Wetovick v. Cnty. of Nance, 782 N.W.2d 298 (Neb. 2010). “[42] See 42 U.S.C. §§ 651 to 669b. (2006). [43] See 42 U.”
White v. Davis, 68 P.3d 74 (Cal. 2003). “§§ 670 -679b), (3) child support programs ( 42 U.S.C. §§ 651 -669b), and (4) child welfare services program ( 42 U.”
Surender Malhan v. Sec'y United States Depart, 938 F.3d 453 (3rd Cir. 2019). “2007) (analyzing 42 U.S.C. §§ 651 , 652, and 654(4)(B), (13)).”
Rose v. Rose, 481 U.S. 619 (1987). “*626 A First, appellant relies on 38 U. S. C. § 3107 (a)(2) (1982 ed.”
Powers v. Off. of Child Support, 795 A.2d 1259 (Vt. 2002). “” 42 U.S.C. § 651 . The child support enforcement services contemplated by the program include creating a system for establishing paternity, locating absent parents, and helping families obtain support orders.”
Howe v. Ellenbecker, 774 F. Supp. 1224 (D.S.D. 1991). “Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves, their children, and all others similarly situated, claiming that they have been denied child support collection services secured them under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act, the Child Support and Establishment of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.