42 U.S.C. § 6710
Authorization of appropriations
There is authorized to be appropriated not to exceed $6,000,000,000 for the period ending
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1977–1980 · leading case: Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448 (1980).
Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448 (1980). “1002 , 42 U. S. C. § 6710 . The actual appropriation of the full amount authorized was made several weeks later.”
Va. Chapter, Associated Gen. Contractors v. Kreps, 444 F. Supp. 1167 (W.D. Va. 1978). “The act was to be administered by the Secretary of Commerce, through the Economic Development Administration (hereinafter “EDA”), which was to distribute funds to state and local governments under the act. Grantees were required to contract out project construction to private…”
City of Benton Harbor v. Richardson, 429 F. Supp. 1096 (W.D. Mich. 1977). “It authorized an appropriation of $2 billion ($2,000,000,000) 1 for these purposes ( 42 U.S.C.A. § 6710 ), to be allocated to projects according to a stated scheme.”
City of Grand Rapids v. Richardson, 429 F. Supp. 1087 (W.D. Mich. 1977). “It authorized an appropriation of $2 billion ($2,000,000,000) 1 for these purposes ( 42 U.S.C.A. § 6710 ), to be allocated to projects according to a stated scheme.”
Associated Gen. Contr., Cal. v. Sec'y of Com., US, 441 F. Supp. 955 (C.D. Cal. 1977). “§§ 6701-6735 , with its authorization of $2 billion ( 42 U.S.C. § 6710 ) (hereinafter "LPW Act"), for the implementation of which Congress appropriated $2 billion in Pub.”
Associated Gen. Contractors v. Sec'y of Com. of the United States Dep't of Com., 441 F. Supp. 955 (C.D. Cal. 1977). “§§ 6701-6735 , with its authorization of $2 billion ( 42 U.S.C. § 6710 ) (hereinafter “LPW Act”), for the implementation of which Congress appropriated $2 billion in Pub.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.