42 U.S.C. § 6904

Governmental cooperation

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Interstate cooperation

The provisions of this chapter to be carried out by States may be carried out by interstate agencies and provisions applicable to States may apply to interstate regions where such agencies and regions have been established by the respective States and approved by the Administrator. In any such case, action required to be taken by the Governor of a State, respecting regional designation shall be required to be taken by the Governor of each of the respective States with respect to so much of the interstate region as is within the jurisdiction of that State.

(b) Consent of Congress to compactsThe consent of the Congress is hereby given to two or more States to negotiate and enter into agreements or compacts, not in conflict with any law or treaty of the United States, for—(1) cooperative effort and mutual assistance for the management of solid waste or hazardous waste (or both) and the enforcement of their respective laws relating thereto, and(2) the establishment of such agencies, joint or otherwise, as they may deem desirable for making effective such agreements or compacts.No such agreement or compact shall be binding or obligatory upon any State a party thereto unless it is agreed upon by all parties to the agreement and until it has been approved by the Administrator and the Congress.(Pub. L. 89–272, title II, § 1005, as added Pub. L. 94–580, § 2, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2801.)Executive DocumentsTransfer of Functions

For transfer of certain enforcement functions of Administrator or other official of Environmental Protection Agency under this chapter to Federal Inspector, Office of Federal Inspector for the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, and subsequent transfer to Secretary of Energy, then to Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects, see note set out under section 6903 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2023 · leading case: Andritz Sprout-Bauer, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc., 174 F.R.D. 609 (M.D. Penn. 1997).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Andritz Sprout-Bauer, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc., 174 F.R.D. 609 (M.D. Penn. 1997). “34:8, in addition to substances classified as “solid' waste” and or “hazardous waste” under sections 1004(27) and 1004(5) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6904 (27) and 6904(5). Claims asserted Andritz asserts claims under the following federal and state laws to recover past and future…”

E.O.R. Energy, LLC v. Pollution Control Bd., 2015 IL App (4th) 130443 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “42 U.S.C. § 6904 (2006). The federal UIC program was prom- - 19 - ulgated under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) (42 U.”

E.O.R. Energy, LLC v. Pollution Control Bd., 2015 IL App (4th) 130443 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “42 U.S.C. § 6904 (2006). The federal UIC program was promulgated under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) (42 U.”

United States v. Charles George Trucking Co., Inc., 624 F. Supp. 1185 (D. Mass. 1986). “§ 6927 (a), or CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 6904 (e)(1). The court finds that the defendants’ interpretation of these two provisions is too restrictive.”

Living Lands, LLC v. Cline (S.D.W. Va 2023). “See 42 U.S.C. § 6904 (29) (defining a “solid waste facility as “any facility for the .”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.