42 U.S.C. § 6930
Effective date
1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–616, § 204(a), inserted provisions after first sentence relating to burning and blending of hazardous wastes and substituted “the preceding provisions” for “the preceding sentence” in three places.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–616, § 234, inserted provision that at the time a regulation is promulgated, the Administrator may provide for a shorter period prior to the effective date, or an immediate effective date for a regulation with which the Administrator finds the regulated community does not need six months to come into compliance, a regulation which responds to an emergency situation, or other good cause found and published with the regulation.
1980—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96–482 struck out “or revision” after “after promulgation or revision of regulations” and inserted provision for filing of notification when revising any regulation identifying additional characteristics of hazardous waste or listing any additional substance as hazardous waste subject to this subchapter.
For transfer of certain enforcement functions of Administrator or other official of Environmental Protection Agency under this chapter to Federal Inspector, Office of Federal Inspector for the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, and subsequent transfer to Secretary of Energy, then to Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects, see note set out under section 6903 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23
cases, 1981–1999 · leading case: Dague v. City of Burlington, 732 F. Supp. 458 (D. Vt. 1989).
Dague v. City of Burlington, 732 F. Supp. 458 (D. Vt. 1989). “Similarly, the City has not violated the notification requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 6930 (a). Pursuant to this subsection, any person, as of August 19, 1980, “.”
United States v. T & S Brass & Bronze Works, Inc., 681 F. Supp. 314 (D.S.C. 1988). “” Under RCRA § 3005, a facility must meet the following criteria to achieve interim status: (1) be in existence on November 19, 1980, or the effective date of the statutory or regulatory changes that render the facility subject to the permit requirement; (2) be in compliance…”
Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Gorsuch, 713 F.2d 802 (D.C. Cir. 1983). “42 U.S.C. § 6930 (b). Recognizing that EPA would be unable to review and issue permits to all existing hazardous waste management facilities by the effective date of the regulations, Congress provided in § 6925(e) that a facility in existence on the date of RCRA’s enactment…”
Lutz v. Chromatex, Inc., 718 F. Supp. 413 (M.D. Penn. 1989). “4 *425 Section 3010 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6930 , imposes a notification requirement similar to that contained in section 103 of CERC-LA, 42 U.”
Thermalkem, Inc. v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 25 F.3d 1233 (3rd Cir. 1994). “70 (a)(1) (1992); see also 42 U.S.C.A. § 6930 (a). Second, the owner or operator must file “Part A” of a RCRA permit application.”
United States (EPA) v. Env't Waste Control, Inc., 710 F. Supp. 1172 (N.D. Ind. 1989). “42 U.S.C. § 6930 . a. Interim Status A hazardous waste facility may be operated only in accordance with a permit.”
McClellan Ecological Seepage Situation v. Weinberger, 707 F. Supp. 1182 (E.D. Cal. 1988). “Count 3 — RCRA § 3010(a) Count 3 alleges that McClellan failed to give EPA notice of its hazardous waste activities under section 3010(a) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6930 (a). That section provides that within ninety days of the promulgation of relevant regulations by EPA, persons…”
Env't Def. Fund, Inc. v. Lamphier, 714 F.2d 331 (4th Cir. 1983). “On August 19, 1980, the notification requirements of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6930 , went into effect. As of that date, all operators of waste disposal sites were required to notify the EPA of their activities.”
United States v. Power Eng'g Co., 10 F. Supp. 2d 1145 (D. Colo. 1998). “The financial responsibility requirements apply “to those owners and operators of facilities in existence on November 19, 1980 who have failed to provide timely notification as required by [ 42 U.S.C. § 6930 (a)] and/or failed to file Part A of the permit application as required…”
United States v. Ekco Housewares, Inc., 62 F.3d 806 (6th Cir. 1995). “Administrative Complaint and Consent Order Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 6930 , Ekco notified the EPA in 1980 that the Massillon facility was generating hazardous wastes, but did not inform the EPA that the Massillon facility was treating, storing, or disposing of hazardous wastes,…”
United States v. Conservation Chem. Co. of Illinois, 660 F. Supp. 1236 (N.D. Ind. 1987). “Pursuant to Section 3010(a) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6930 (a), on August 18, 1980, the defendants notified the EPA that hazardous wastes were being treated, stored, or disposed at the Gary site.”
United States v. WCI Steel, Inc., 72 F. Supp. 2d 810 (N.D. Ohio 1999). “Each day that Defendant operated Ponds 5, 6, and 6A without including these hazardous waste management units in any Part A application and without amending any Part A application is a separate violation of 42 U.S.C. § 6930 and O.A.C. § 3745-50-43.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.