42 U.S.C. § 709
COMPLIANCE.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2005–2020 · leading case: Reiser v. New Jersey Air Nat'l Guard, 152 F. App'x 235 (3rd Cir. 2005).
Reiser v. New Jersey Air Nat'l Guard, 152 F. App'x 235 (3rd Cir. 2005). “42 U.S.C. § 709 (emphasis added). Because the NGTA unequivocally states that a technician such as Reiser is an employee of the Department of the Air Force and the United States, she undoubtedly is a federal employee.”
Cooper v. Berger (N.C. 2020). “See 42 U.S.C. § 709 (b). Likewise, NC DHHS administers the SABG program pursuant to federal legislative authority.”
Francis v. Jt. Force Headquarters, 240 F. App'x 534 (3rd Cir. 2007). “We also agree with the District Court’s determination that Francis was an employee of the Department of the Army under 42 U.S.C. § 709 . See Ass’n of Civilian Technicians v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.