42 U.S.C. § 710

LOBBYING RESTRICTIONS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

“(a)In General.—No funds derived from assessments under section 707 collected by the Alliance shall be used to influence legislation or elections or to lobby, except that the Alliance may use such funds to formulate and submit to the Secretary recommendations for amendments to this title or other laws that would further the purposes of this title.“(b)Assessments.—“(1)In general.—Subject to paragraph (2), no funds derived from assessments collected by the Alliance under section 707 shall be used, directly or indirectly, to influence Federal, State, or local legislation or elections, or the manner of administering of a law.“(2)Information.—The Alliance may use funds described in paragraph (1) to provide information requested by a Member of Congress, or an official of any Federal, State, or local agency, in the course of the official business of the Member or official.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2008–2023 · leading case: Planned Parenthood of N.Y.C., Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 337 F. Supp. 3d 308 (S.D. Ill. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Planned Parenthood of N.Y.C., Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 337 F. Supp. 3d 308 (S.D. Ill. 2018). · cites it 2× “"Rigorous evaluation" appears in the statutory provisions of the State Abstinence Education Program, 42 U.S.C. § 710 , which defines " 'rigorous,' with respect to research or evaluation," as "using (A) established scientific methods .”

Gonzalez Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. Sch. Bd. of Okeechobee Cnty., 571 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (S.D. Fla. 2008). · cites it 7× “42 U.S.C. § 710 (b)(2). The State of Florida also statutorily mandates abstinence to be a core feature of its instruction concerning the nature and transmission of acquired immune deficiency syndrome.”

Multnomah Cnty., an Existing Cnty. Gov'T&a Body Politic & Corp. v. Azar, 340 F. Supp. 3d 1046 (D. Or. 2018). · cites it 4× “" 42 U.S.C. § 710 (2)(A) (2000). These programs taught "abstinence from sexual activity outside marriage as the expected standard for all school age children," and "that sexual activity outside of the context of marriage is likely to have harmful psychological and physical…”

Alexander Smith v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs. (MSPB 2023). · cites it 2× “For example, the appellant believed that the agency should provide further guidance to grant applicants on how to show that their education programs are “medically accurate” and their research is “evidence based,” as required by 42 U.S.C. § 710 (b)(2), (5). IAF, Tab 1 at 5, 9-12.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.