42 U.S.C. § 7138

Repealed. Pub. L. 100–504, title I, § 102(e)(1)(A), Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2517

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1978–1989 · leading case: United States of Am. & J. Kenneth Mansfield, Inspector Gen. of the Dep't of Energy v. John Iannone, Am. Petroleum Inst., 610 F.2d 943 (D.C. Cir. 1979).
United States of Am. & J. Kenneth Mansfield, Inspector Gen. of the Dep't of Energy v. John Iannone, Am. Petroleum Inst., 610 F.2d 943 (D.C. Cir. 1979). · cites it 8× “On appeal the government contends that the Inspector General’s authority to compel Iannone’s appearance to give testimony derives from either of two sources in the Department of Energy Organization Act: (1) the Inspector General’s special subpoena power conferred by 42 U.S.C. §…”
Gulf Oil Corp. v. United States Dep't of Energy, 663 F.2d 296 (D.C. Cir. 1981). · cites it 3× “The Office of Inspector General was created by Congress in § 208 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7138 . The Inspector General is appointed by the President, and reports directly to the Secretary.”
United States v. Iannone, 458 F. Supp. 41 (D.D.C. 1978). · cites it 7× “42 U.S.C. § 7138 (b)(1). Section 208(g)(2) of the Act provides that the Inspector General is authorized: to require by subpoena the production of all information, documents, reports, answers, records, accounts, papers, and other data and documentary evidence necessary in the…”
Covert v. Harrington, 876 F.2d 751 (9th Cir. 1989). · cites it 2× “See 42 U.S.C. § 7138 . Even the plaintiffs concede that the IG has the “authority to conduct investigations with respect to promoting economy and efficiency in the administra *754 tion of programs of DOE, and for the prevention or detection of fraud and abuse.”
Covert v. Herrington, 667 F. Supp. 730 (E.D. Wash. 1987). · cites it 2× “This court previously has determined that the IG was entitled to examine the personnel security files under the “need to know” exception of § 552a(b)(l) and 42 U.S.C. § 7138 (b)(1), which vests the IG with the duty of detecting fraud or abuse in DOE programs and operations.”
Morgan v. Mansfield, 569 F. Supp. 710 (D. Colo. 1983). “42 U.S.C. § 7138 . The IG is also charged with recommending policies and programs for promoting economy and efficiency in the administration of programs and operations of DOE.”
Covert v. Herrington, 663 F. Supp. 577 (E.D. Wash. 1987). · cites it 10× “However, under 42 U.S.C. § 7138 (b)(1), the Inspector General must .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.