42 U.S.C. § 7661
Definitions
The term “affected source” shall have the meaning given such term in subchapter IV–A.
The term “schedule of compliance” means a schedule of remedial measures, including an enforceable sequence of actions or operations, leading to compliance with an applicable implementation plan, emission standard, emission limitation, or emission prohibition.
The term “permitting authority” means the Administrator or the air pollution control agency authorized by the Administrator to carry out a permit program under this subchapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 87
cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1995–2026 · leading case: Romoland School District v. Inland Empire Energy Center, LLC
Romoland School District v. Inland Empire Energy Center, LLC (2008)
“IEEC's motion to dismiss contended, among other things, that the district court lacked jurisdiction over the suit because IEEC had been granted a permit under Title V of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7661 -7661f, and such permits may not be challenged in civil or criminal enforcement…”
Cal. Cmty. Against Toxics v. Envtl. Prot. Agency (2019)
“Presumably in recognition of this, Congress enacted Title V of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7661 et seq., which makes it unlawful for a source subject to regulations under the Act – including GACT or MACT standards under § 112 – to operate without a permit, see id.”
New York v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. (2003)
“§ 7475 , with 42 U.S.C. § 7661 et seq.; see Illinois Power, at 955-56 (recognizing the importance of the Act’s separate requirements for preconstruction permits and operating permits).”
Griffin Industries, Inc. v. Irvin (2007)
“On August 6, 2002, the EPD issued a draft permit for the Griffin facility pursuant to Title V of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7661 -7661Í. 1 Griffin objected to certain aspects of the draft Title V permit, *1195 and EPD and Griffin negotiated over the permit that fall.”
United States Sugar Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency (2016)
“42 U.S.C. §§ 7661 et seq.— “Title V Permits” Finally, the 1990 CAA Amendments added a provision to Title V of the Act that requires all owners and operators of HAP sources to obtain operating permits.”
Public Citizen, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2003)
“RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: Primarily at issue is whether, pursuant to Title V of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7661 -7661Í, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had authority to grant full approval to Texas’ operating permit program, notwithstanding program…”
CleanCOALition v. TXU POWER (2008)
“§ 7475 (preconstruction permits) with 42 U.S.C. § 7661 , et seq. (operation permits).”
McEvoy v. IEI Barge Services, Inc. (2010)
“Emission standards and limitations enforceable through § 7604(a)(1)(A) include: (1) a schedule or timetable of compliance, emission limitation, standard of performance or emission standard, [or] (4) any other standard, limitation, or schedule established under any permit issued…”
Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection Agency (2008)
“42 U.S.C. § 7661 (4). [2] EPA promulgated materially similar rules to govern instances where the agency, rather than state and local authorities, assumes responsibility for issuing permits.”
Sierra Club v. Georgia Power Co. (2006)
“The Title V Permit In 1990, Congress amended the Clean Air Act to add Title V, see 42 U.S.C. §§ 7661 -7661f, to assist in compliance and enforcement of air pollution controls.”
Ocean County Landfill Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2011)
“See generally 42 U.S.C. §§ 7661 -7661f. Although a federal requirement, Title V permitting programs are administered and enforced primarily by state and local air permitting authorities, though EPA oversight continues.”
National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2007)
“§ 7475 (setting forth requirements to be met prior to construction), with 42 U.S.C. § 7661 et seq. (governing operating permits) and 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.