43 U.S.C. § 1734

Fees, charges, and commissions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 43 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Authority to establish and modify

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may establish reasonable filing and service fees and reasonable charges, and commissions with respect to applications and other documents relating to the public lands and may change and abolish such fees, charges, and commissions.

(b) Deposits for payments to reimburse reasonable costs of United States

The Secretary is authorized to require a deposit of any payments intended to reimburse the United States for reasonable costs with respect to applications and other documents relating to such lands. The moneys received for reasonable costs under this subsection shall be deposited with the Treasury in a special account and are hereby authorized to be appropriated and made available until expended. As used in this section “reasonable costs” include, but are not limited to, the costs of special studies; environmental impact statements; monitoring construction, operation, maintenance, and termination of any authorized facility; or other special activities. In determining whether costs are reasonable under this section, the Secretary may take into consideration actual costs (exclusive of management overhead), the monetary value of the rights or privileges sought by the applicant, the efficiency to the government processing involved, that portion of the cost incurred for the benefit of the general public interest rather than for the exclusive benefit of the applicant, the public service provided, and other factors relevant to determining the reasonableness of the costs.

(c) Refunds

In any case where it shall appear to the satisfaction of the Secretary that any person has made a payment under any statute relating to the sale, lease, use, or other disposition of public lands which is not required or is in excess of the amount required by applicable law and the regulations issued by the Secretary, the Secretary, upon application or otherwise, may cause a refund to be made from applicable funds.

(Pub. L. 94–579, title III, § 304, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2765.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesFiling Fees for Applications for Noncompetitive Oil and Gas Leases; Study and Report of Rental Charges on Oil and Gas Leases

Pub. L. 97–35, title XIV, § 1401(d), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 748, provided that:“(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, effective October 1, 1981, all applications for noncom­petitive oil and gas leases shall be accompanied by a filing fee of not less than $25 for each such application: Provided, That any increase in the filing fee above $25 shall be established by regulation and subject to the provisions of the Act of August 31, 1951 (65 Stat. 290) [probably means title V of that Act which was classified to section 483a of former Title 31, Money and Finance and was repealed and reenacted as section 9701 of Title 31 by Pub. L. 97–258] the Act of October 20, 1976 (90 Stat. 2765) [probably should be Oct. 21, 1976, meaning this chapter] but not limited to actual costs. Such fees shall be retained as a service charge even though the application or offer may be rejected or withdrawn in whole or in part.“(2) The Secretary of the Interior is hereby directed to conduct a study and report to Congress within one year of the date of enactment of this Act [Aug. 13, 1981], regarding the current annual rental charges on all noncompetitive oil and gas leases to investigate the feasibility and effect of raising such rentals.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1979–2026 · leading case: Amoco Prod. Co. v. Donald P. Hodel, Sec'y of Dep't of the Interior, Defendants, 815 F.2d 352 (5th Cir. 1987).
Amoco Prod. Co. v. Donald P. Hodel, Sec'y of Dep't of the Interior, Defendants, 815 F.2d 352 (5th Cir. 1987). · cites it 2× “The refund was sought under 43 U.S.C. § 1734 (c), 12 a statute very similar to the refund statute at issue in Amoco’s case, 43 U.”
Nevada Power Co. v. Watt, 515 F. Supp. 307 (D. Utah 1981). · cites it 6× “Section 304(b), 43 U.S.C. § 1734 (b), provides that “reasonable costs” for the purposes of that section include the costs of Environmental Impact Statements, and further that in determining whether costs are reasonable, the Secretary may take into consideration various factors,…”
Marathon Oil Co. v. United States, 16 Cl. Ct. 332 (Ct. Cl. 1989). · cites it 3× “Another basis for plaintiffs Tucker Act claim is 43 U.S.C. § 1734 (c) (1982), which provides: In any case where it shall appear to the satisfaction of the Secretary that any person has made a payment under any statute relating to the sale, lease, use, or other disposition of…”
Us Ecology, Inc., & California Dep't of Health Servs. v. United States, 245 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2001). “This agreement states that it was made pursuant to 43 U.S.C. § 1734 , “which allows [the federal government] to charge applicants for the reasonable costs associated with the processing of a federal land transaction.”
Alumet v. Cecil D. Andrus, 607 F.2d 911 (10th Cir. 1979). · cites it 2× “) 43 U.S.C. § 1734 (b) provides as follows: § 1734.”
Colorado-Ute Elec. Ass'n, Inc. v. Watt, 533 F. Supp. 197 (D. Colo. 1982). · cites it 3× “Section 304 of the FLPMA, 43 U.S.C. § 1734 , provides in part: (a) .”
Foote Mineral Co. v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 230 (Ct. Cl. 1981). “Plaintiff seeks a refund pursuant to 43 U.S.C. § 1734 (c) (1976), which provides: *233 In any case where it shall appear to the satisfaction of the Secretary that any person has made a payment under any statute relating to the sale, lease, use, or other disposition of public…”
Walker v. United States, 11 Cl. Ct. 77 (Ct. Cl. 1986). “2d 81, 83 (1981) (basing jurisdiction to review administrative decision on 43 U.S.C. § 1734 (c), which authorized money refund).”
Nevada Power Co. v. Watt, 711 F.2d 913 (10th Cir. 1983). · cites it 2× “FLPMA §§ 304, 310, 504(c), (g), 43 U.S.C. §§ 1734 , 1740, 1764(c), (g). Three district courts, in cases involving almost identical issues of fact and law, reached differing results on the central issue we must resolve here: whether the Secretary adequately considered the…”
Topaz Beryllium Co. v. United States, 479 F. Supp. 309 (D. Utah 1979). “00 filing fee, 43 U.S.C. § 1734 authorizes such fees if they are “reasonable”.”
Sohio Transp. Co. v. United States, 5 Cl. Ct. 620 (Ct. Cl. 1984). “FLPMA § 304, 43 U.S.C. § 1734 (1976). Interior, on September 29,1977, promulgated Secretarial Order No.”
Black Butte Coal Co. v. United States, 27 Fed. Cl. 699 (Fed. Cl. 1993). “43 U.S.C. § 1734 (c) (1988). . The limitation echoed a regulation in effect when the lease was negotiated.”
— 43 U.S.C. § 1734(b) — 1 case
— 43 U.S.C. § 1734(c) — 1 case
Wheless v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.