Notes of Decisions
Deep Sea Rsch., Inc. v. Brother Jonathan, 883 F. Supp. 1343 (N.D. Cal. 1995).
· cites it 8× “§ 2106 (a), and the question of title is settled by 43 U.S.C. § 2105 (a) and (c). If a State alleges that it has a “colorable claim” to a shipwreck under state law, the State must demonstrate whether, and to what extent, its law regarding shipwrecks co-exists with, or is…”
Allen v. Cooper, 589 U.S. 248 (2020).
“433 , 43 U.S.C. § 2105 (c) ; N.C. Gen. Stat. Ann.”
People ex rel. Illinois Historic Pres. Agency v. Zych, 710 N.E.2d 820 (Ill. 1999).
· cites it 2× “See 43 U.S.C. § 2105 (c) (1994). At the ensuing bench trial, the State attempted to prove that (1) Aetna had never obtained title to the shipwreck in the first instance, because it had refused to accept “abandonment,” or ownership of, the wreck; and (2) even if Aetna had taken…”
Sunken Treasure, Inc. v. Unidentified, Wrecked, & Abandoned Vessel, 857 F. Supp. 1129 (D.V.I. 1994).
· cites it 5× “Both intervenors seek to be declared owners of the defendant vessel pursuant to the Abandoned Shipwreck Act of 1987, 43 U.S.C. § 2105 et seq. (hereinafter the "ASA"), and seek an order restraining STI from conducting salvage operations in Salt River.”
Ne. Rsch., LLC v. One Shipwrecked Vessel, 790 F. Supp. 2d 56 (W.D.N.Y. 2011).
· cites it 5× “43 U.S.C. § 2105 (a). Title is then automatically transferred to the State in which the abandoned ship is located.”
Ne. Rsch., LLC v. One Shipwrecked Vessel, 729 F.3d 197 (2d Cir. 2013).
“43 U.S.C. § 2105 (a). If a shipwreck qualifies as property of the United States under § 2105(a), the ASA automatically transfers title to the state “in or on whose submerged lands the shipwreck is located.”
Trueman v. Historic Steamtug New York, 120 F. Supp. 2d 228 (N.D.N.Y. 2000).
· cites it 3× “43 U.S.C. § 2105 (a). Title is then automatically transferred to the State in which the abandoned ship is located.”
43 U.S.C. § 2105(a): 1 case
People ex rel. Illinois Historic Pres. Agency v. Zych, 710 N.E.2d 820 (Ill. 1999).
“See 43 U.S.C. § 2105 (c) (1994). At the ensuing bench trial, the State attempted to prove that (1) Aetna had never obtained title to the shipwreck in the first instance, because it had refused to accept “abandonment,” or ownership of, the wreck; and (2) even if Aetna had taken…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.