43 U.S.C. § 270
Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, § 703(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2789
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1975–2015 · leading case: Sarah Pence v. Thomas S. Kleppe, Individually & as Sec'y of the Interior of the United States & His Agents, & the United States of Am., 529 F.2d 135 (9th Cir. 1976).
Sarah Pence v. Thomas S. Kleppe, Individually & as Sec'y of the Interior of the United States & His Agents, & the United States of Am., 529 F.2d 135 (9th Cir. 1976). “954 ; 43 U.S.C. §§ 270 -1— 270 — 3 (1970), repealed but with a saving clause for applications pending on December 18, 1971, by P.”
United States v. Atl. Richfield Co., 435 F. Supp. 1009 (D. Alaska 1977). “409 , 43 U.S.C. § 270 . 8 . Act of June 6, 1900, Ch.”
Luker v. Sykes, 357 P.3d 1191 (Alaska 2015). “"); see also 43 U.S.C. §§ 270 , 270-5 to 270-12, 270-14 to 270-17 (1964 supp.”
Sabo v. Horvath, 559 P.2d 1038 (Alaska 1976). “9 The importance of the Alaska Homesite Law’s silence with respect to alienation is again underlined by the fact that Congress extended the anti-alienation provision of the general homestead laws to the Alaska Homestead Act, 43 U.S.C. § 270 (1970). 10 *1042 It is clear from the…”
Aquilar v. Kleppe, 424 F. Supp. 433 (D. Alaska 1976). “These plaintiffs, Alaska Natives, allege that they were entitled to the land under the Alaska Native Allotment Act, 43 U.S.C. § 270 — 1-§ 270-3. Although this Act was repealed by the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, 43 U.”
Eluska v. Andrus, 587 F.2d 996 (9th Cir. 1978). “954 , 43 U.S.C. §§ 270 — 1 to 270 — 3 (1970), repealed, but with a saving clause for applications pending on December 18, 1971, by P.”
Pence v. Andrus, 586 F.2d 733 (9th Cir. 1978). “954 : 43 U.S.C. §§ 270 — 1 to 270 — 3 (1970), repealed, but with a saving clause for applications pending on December 18, 1971, by P.”
Pence v. Morton, 391 F. Supp. 1021 (D. Alaska 1975). “This cause comes before the court upon plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction restraining the defendants and their attorneys, officers, agents, servants, and employees from adversely adjudicating Native Land Allotment applications in whole or in part under the Native…”
Reeves v. Andrus, 465 F. Supp. 1065 (D. Alaska 1979). “See 43 U.S.C.A. § 270 (Supp.1978). 2 . § 818.”
Luker v. Sykes (Alaska 2015). “”); see also 43 U.S.C. §§ 270 , 270-5 to 270-12, 270-14 to 270-17 (1964 supp.”
Pence v. Andrus, 429 F. Supp. 516 (D. Alaska 1977). “The first is whether plaintiffs’ class consisting of Alaska Natives seeking land allotments under the Alaska Native Allotment Act, 43 U.S.C. §§ 270 -1—270-3 will be denied due process by the operation of certain regulations adopted for the processing of their applications.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.