43 U.S.C. § 324

Assignment of entries

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 43 CasesGoogle Scholar

No assignment after March 28, 1908, of an entry made under sections 321 to 323, 325, and 327 to 329 of this title shall be allowed or recognized, except it be to an individual who is shown to be qualified to make entry under said sections of the land covered by the assigned entry, and such assignments may include all or part of an entry; but no assignment to or for the benefit of any corporation or association shall be authorized or recognized.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1973–1978 · leading case: Wallace Reed v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Sec'y of the Interior, United States of Am. v. Hood Corp., 480 F.2d 634 (9th Cir. 1973).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Wallace Reed v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Sec'y of the Interior, United States of Am. v. Hood Corp., 480 F.2d 634 (9th Cir. 1973). “52 (codified as 43 U.S. C. § 324). Hoodco, however, submits that the administrative practice of canceling entries when secret assignments are discovered is inapplicable because, unlike the secret assignment in Oakley, the arrangement here was not an explicit formal contract, but…”

Morris v. Andrus, 593 F.2d 851 (9th Cir. 1978). “*853 The effect of the leases and mortgages and other related contracts was clearly a violation of 43 U.S.C. § 324 : “No assignment after March 28, 1908, of an entry made under sections 321 to 323, 325 and 327 to 329 of this title shall be allowed or recognized, except it be to…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.